Thursday, February 27, 2025, 12:50 pm | Randy Thomasson
Please scroll down to see 10 essential things you can urge the Trump Administration to do in California. But first, celebrate the good that President Trump is already doing!
Here are 3 needful ways President Trump is already helping California:
1. HALTING THE BULLET TRAIN BOONDOGGLE: In Los Angeles on Feb. 20, President Trump’s Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy announced he’s commencing a “compliance review” into California’s wasteful “bullet train” to determine how Newsom & Co. spent $4.3 BILLION in federal funds already given.
For all practical purposes, this action will prevent new federal funding of the Democrat Party machine’s “bullet train’ boondoggle. And without federal funding, the “work” on the “train to nowhere” will likely cease due to the project’s professed dependence on federal funds.
2. PREVENT AND DEPORT INVADERS: More good news is President Trump is already fighting for American security and identity by stationing U.S. troops at our border with Mexico.
Next, you can expect a federal lawsuit against the pro-illegal-alien State of California and California “sanctuary cities” (new U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi has already sued the big Democrat-Party states of Illinois and New York).
3. KEEP DRIVING WITH RELIABLE GASOLINE: You can also expect the Republican-controlled Congress to override the California “waivers” to “ban” new gasoline-powered cars as of 2035.
After Trump was reelected, Newsom & Co. sought 8 “waivers” limiting or prohibiting gasoline-powered engines “from locomotives to leaf blowers.” These awful notions of Democrat Party politicians would make electricity more costly and less reliable. Therefore, it’s a relief the Republican Congress is expected to overrule and deny them.
Yet there are ADDITIONAL, PRESSING PROBLEMS for the Trump Administration to solve in California — in at least 10 key areas!
PLEASE TAKE QUICK ACTION: Contact the White House (web form) and the U.S. Dept. of Justice (web form) to lobby them to intervene in California.
It’s most effective if you use the Trump and DOJ web forms for one subject at a time, sending up to 10 separate messages. Each time, in the subject-line field, type a clear message, such as, “Investigate election fraud in California.”
Investigate, expose, and prosecute California election fraud (see more)
Investigate California hospitals that still mutilate children (see more)
Investigate California’s sky-high electricity rates (see more)
Investigate California’s oppressive water rates and water shortages (see more)
Commence aggressive forest management on all federal land in California (the U.S. government owns 45.4% of the land in California, most of it forest and other wilderness areas)
Sue or join existing federal lawsuits to restore our Second Amendment rights (see more)
Investigate vaccine tyranny (“take the shot or else”) where it exists — vaccines should be voluntary (see more)
Investigate violations of religious liberty — for small business owners, students, employees, and more — based on the First Amendment, the 1964 Civil Rights Act, and numerous federal laws
Investigate violations of parental rights in federal law (see more)
Tuesday, October 22, 2024, 6:12 pm | Randy Thomasson
Because election fraud is real, I urge you to vote early, in person, and with a paper ballot.
Stop and realize the overall benefit is having the least number of strangers’ hands on your ballot.
As we know, nationwide, “discrepancies” have occurred with “election-day ballots” and “ballots counted after election day” (ballots in envelopes) and wherever computerized machines do the counting (and adding and subtracting).
Yes, because of human sin and domestic enemies (New Communist Democrats), there’s a real problem with election integrity, not just in California, but nationwide.
So it behooves you to avoid computers, avoid election-day voting, and avoid submitting your ballot in an envelope. This gives your ballot its best chance to count — unmolested.
To help honest voters on the “Left Coast,” Election Integrity Project, California is recommending, based on a new law in effect here in 2024, for “voters to cast their marked vote by mail ballot at the polls without the security envelope.”
Again, this method means having the least number of strangers’ hands on your ballot, avoiding manipulatable computers, and avoiding the election fraud done on election-day ballots and ballots in sealed envelopes opened after the polls close on election day.
Californians’ ability to vote this way is based on AB 626, which went into effect this year, reading: “A voter may vote their vote by mail ballot, without the identification envelope, in person at the polling place designated for the voter’s home precinct or at a vote center.”
However, this option might not be available in all of California’s 58 counties. Because AB 626 is conditional on the county elections office being set up to handle it.
What we know is that the 29 California counties participating in the Voter’s Choice Act of 2016 — a pre-Covid tyranny bill that exchanged neighborhood polling places for several “vote centers” in a county, where you can vote in person — have already agreed per the Act’s provisions to accept voters casting their already-marked vote-by-mail ballots, in person, without the “security envelope.”
As EIP California explains, “Voter’s Choice Act and Electronic Poll Book counties … must now allow voters to cast their marked vote by mail ballot at the polls without the security envelope.”
The 29 California counties participating in the Voter’s Choice Act (VCA), which includes several physical voting centers and letting voters cast paper ballots, are Alameda, Amador, Butte, Calaveras, El Dorado, Fresno, Humboldt, Kings, Los Angeles, Madera, Marin, Mariposa, Merced, Napa, Nevada, Orange, Placer, Riverside, Sacramento, San Benito, San Diego, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, Sonoma, Stanislaus, Tuolumne, Ventura, Yolo.
We don’t know how many counties, in addition to this, are Electronic Poll Book counties that will also accept marked vote-by-mail ballots without the envelope. Your best bet is to call your own county elections office, and tell them you want to vote in person using a paper ballot and how to do it.
Where election fraud and New Communist Democrat thievery exist, you must do what you can to secure your ballot. Yes, liberals like fraud-inviting mail-in ballots. Yet you can be glad you can now cast your marked vote-by-mail ballot in person without the envelope.
Regarding Step 4 (above), some election integrity activists refuse to use a Ballot Marking Device (BMD) and also report not all vote centers have paper ballot scanners. They say instead of using a BMD (which, nowadays, is mostly for people with disabilities), they’ll leave for another vote center that will serve them.
Your best bet in your county is to go to your election headquarters to vote in person — and early — and by casting your already-marked vote-by-mail ballot as your paper ballot, you’ll create a “verified paper record” and avoid your ballot being “trucked” from one place to another, thus making it harder for domestic enemies to manipulate your ballot.
Please don’t regard this as too complex. Because when election fraud is real and you want your vote to count, it’s going to take a little more effort. Join me in being glad 2024 has ushered in a new law, where half or more of California’s counties will let you cast the most secure ballot you can.
Thursday, March 14, 2024, 8:12 am | Randy Thomasson
SaveCalifornia.com provides this solely for educational purposes and does not support or oppose candidates for public office.
March 21 update: We’ve added State Senate District 37 in Orange County, where a Republican challenger could oust an incumbent Democrat.
March 19 update: All election-tracking links on this post have been updated due to Secretary of State Shirley Weber’s office changing her urls right in the midst of processing ballots. Two more Assembly races that could be won by Republicans have been added.
* * *
In California’s March 5 (actually month-long and not over yet) “jungle primary” election, it was a chance for pro-family voters to support constitutional fighters over RINOs. Were conservative voters wise or foolish?
Now that the “dust has settled” the week after voting ended in all the California races for State Assembly, State Senate, and the U.S. House of Representatives, here are my observations, which I hope will help you vote, volunteer, and donate this election year.
Needed: Constitutional fighters to expose evil
The overwhelming need of pro-family citizens — who live in California or who have family and friends to live here — is to have at least one Republican in each house of the California State Legislature who will stand and speak to expose the harm of Democrat Party politicians and their evil bills.
In recent decades, reliable speakers in the Assembly for constitutional, moral/social/fiscal conservative values have included Tim Donnelly of the Inland Empire’s high desert, and before him, Steve Baldwin of San Diego County. And in the California State Senate in the 1990s, we had Ray Haynes and Dick Mountjoy.
But now, they’re gone, and more than two decades later, I can’t count on one reliable, consistent California state legislator who knows he or she is accountable before God and who will speak up for family values and expose the harm of “LGBTQIA+” bills, baby-killing bills, and other immoral bills, whether they be moral, social, or fiscal in nature.
Yes, I know there are some legislators who speak up for parental rights, but did you know they also vote for “LGBTQIA+” or increasing union-boss power or are otherwise mute when bad bills come up?
Which means, today, because of silence, acquiescence, and lack of exposure, the devilish Democrat Party supermajority in both houses in Sacramento has had “smooth sailing” — because no current Republican legislator will reliably stir up a storm whenever a bad bill comes up on the Assembly or Senate floor!
Conservative, constitutional, pro-family legislators standing and raising their microphones is the priority. Because when you’re in the numerical minority in Sacramento, your voice matters more than your votes.
RINOs getting worse and more plentiful
Here are some of the RINOs (Republicans In Name Only) who are likely to be reelected, return to Sacramento, and vote for some evil Democrat bills:
California State Assembly Voting in 2023 in favor of both pro-“LGBTQIA+” bills or pro-abortion bills or both were:
• Greg Wallis of Bermuda Dunes: AB 659, AB 5, AB 223, AB 352, AB 443, AB 492, AB 576, AB 598, AB 957, AB 1078, AB 1194, AB 1432, HR 33, ACA 5, SB 345, SB 385, SB 760
• Juan Alanis of Modesto: AB 5, AB 352, AB 443, AB 492, AB 598, AB 1194, AB 1432, HR 33, ACA 5, SB 541, SB 760
• Marie Waldron of Escondido: AB 5, AB 443. HR 33, ACA 5, SB 58, SB 541, SB 729, SB 760
• Laurie Davies of Laguna Niguel: ACA 5, AB 1194, SB 541
Of the 4 biggest RINOs in the Assembly: Greg Wallis, whose district is in the Greater Palm Springs area, is likely returning because no conservative, pro-family primary opponent who would take him on.
Similarly, Juan Alanis, whose district covers Stanislaus and Merced counties, had no conservative, pro-family Republican primary challenger for Alanis’ reelection campaign.
Marie Waldron, of inland San Diego County, is termed out of office, yet this final year she’s pushing her AB 941 to require the State to embark on a path of legalization of “hallucinogenic or psychedelic substances,” which make our society more dangerous.
The rest of the Assembly Republicans listed above, who’ve supported either pro-“LGBTQIA+” or pro-abortion bills or both, are likely to be reelected due to having no conservative Republican primary challengers.
California State Senate In the California State Senate, 2 “Republicans” voted for Democrat bills promoting baby-killing or “LGBTQIA+” or both were led by:
• Scott Wilk of Santa Clarita: AB 352, AB 659, AB 1194, ACA 5
• Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh of Yucaipa: SR 33, SB 760, AB 1194
In addition:
• Both Wilk and Ochoa Bogh supported AB 1352 (which fortunately did not pass the Legislature) to permit liberal school boards to boot off conservative members.
• The sole Republican voting in favor of the Democrats’ SB 274 (signed into law by Gov. Gavin Newsom) to largely eliminate government-school suspensions or expulsions of disruptive, defiant “students,” was Brian Dahle of Bieber.
The State Senate’s biggest RINOs: Scott Wilk, whose district covers Southern California’s Antelope and Victor Valleys, is termed out. Despite adding to California’s immorality, Wilk says he’ll move out of state.
Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh, whose sprawling Inland Empire district runs from Rancho Cucamonga to Hemet, is running for reelection in the newly-drawn 19th District covering much of eastern San Bernardino County. This primary election, she did not have a true pro-family, conservative Republican challenger.
RINOs in California’s Republican congressional delegation: Among California’s current 11 Republican U.S. Representatives, some have cast controversial votes for or against impeachment; yet there are six (in alphabetical order) who’ve supported the unnatural, unhealthy, unbiblical, tyrannical “LGBTQIA+” agenda:
Ken Calvert (1)
Mike Garcia (1)
Jay Obernolte (1)(3)
Darrell Issa (1)(2)
David Valadao (1)(2)
(1) Voted to “codify” homosexual “marriages” in federal law (July 19, 2022)
(2) Supported or did not oppose taxpayer-fund “sex changes” in U.S. military (July 13, 2017)
(3) In the 2818-2019 California State Assembly, Obernolte twice voted in support of “LGBTQIA+” and abstained on pro-“LGBTQIA+” resolution attacking Christian churches
In the northern reaches of Los Angeles County, Suzette Valladares, who was the most liberal Republican in the State Assembly*, was the top vote-getter in the primary election for the newly-drawn State Senate District 23 stretching from Santa Clarita in Los Angeles County to Hesperia in San Bernardino County.
* On June 27, 2022, then-Assemblywoman Suzette Valladares was the only Republican voting yes on SCA 10 to ask voters to place “the right” to unlimited taxpayer-funded abortions into the California State Constitution. Sadly, the Democrat politicians’ baby-killing SCA 10 (Prop. 1 on the November 2022 ballot) is now state law.
Is it wise to vote for ‘the lesser of two evils’?
You might think, “If I don’t vote for the lesser of two evils, I’m contributing to a worse government.” Or you might think, “It’s better to get anyone in office who’s registered as my party of choice — even a liberal — than someone from the opposing party.”
Yet both these ideas contribute to mid-term and long-term evil. Because you and I see what liberal Republicans have wrought: Political prostitution, failure to fight or speak against evil, deeper debt, more baby-killing, more sexual perversity, less religious freedom, less free speech, and less medical freedom. When “Republicans In Name Only” (RINOs) become numerous in a Republican caucus, the result is all that frustrates and grieves you about the modern Republican Party.
For only a liberal Republican can redefine or replace the Republican Party. And that’s what’s been happening the last few decades, all because of the fallacy of voting for “the lesser of two evils.”
Then how should you, a moral, constitutional conservative, vote? This is how I vote in a general election: I will only support dependable conservatives, but not RINOs, and not Democrats. If the Democrat wins, then the RINO has lost, and I and my friends get to work a) exposing the misdeeds of the elected Democrat, and b) recruiting a true, conservative, constitutional fighter for the next election.
Will these conservatives expose the darkness?
As I’ve already explained, there are too many RINOs and seat-warmers (conservative legislators who mostly vote right but do not speak up for moral, family-values issues). Again, we need pro-family fighters who will speak up and expose the harm and dysfunction of the ruling Democrats. Republicans can’t win with their votes, but they can expose the lies and harm of Democrat Party agendas, if they wish.
These following non-incumbent candidates are moral conservatives, who, if elected, might have the vision to stand and speak for you and your values. Because articulate moral voices to expose evil are desperately needed on the Assembly and Senate floors in Sacramento.
California State Assembly Covering parts of Fresno and Madera counties, much of the Sierra Nevada mountain range, Inyo County and Death Valley, Assembly District 8 looks like it will have a Republican winner in November because, right now, Republican candidates are both of the top two vote-getters. If former congressman George Radanovich wins, he could expose much evil in Sacramento. For, as Radanovich says on his own website, he “believes many societal problems can be traced directly to the breakdown of families.” How refreshing for someone to tell it like it is. In Congress from 1995 to 2011, Radanovich is rated by the voter-tracking-database OnTheIssues as a “Hard-Core Conservative.”
In Orange County’s Assembly District 73, Scotty Peotter is a long-time moral, Christian conservative activist. If he beats incumbent Democrat Cottie Petrie-Norris, Peotter could be a noticeable moral-values voice on the Assembly floor.
In west Riverside County, will Republican Leticia Castillo (already earning 48.5% of the primary vote) take back this formerly Republican seat? On her website, Leticia seems strongly pro-family, with faith in God.
In Stockton and San Joaquin County, could parental-rights and medical-freedom activist Denise Aguilar Mendez win an open Assembly seat? In Assembly District 13, she’s received 36.2% so far. But as the second-highest vote-getter, if she works hard, Denise’s ability to attract followers could surprise many.
California State Senate Covering San Joaquin County and the 680 corridor in Alameda County, the newly-drawn State Senate District 5 is an open seat, where super-patriot and strong moral Californian Jim Shoemaker, as the Republican candidate, received 44.1% on just a “shoestring” campaign against two well-funded Democrats. Going into the general election, if Shoemaker receives adequate funding to reach non-union, “common man” voters and diligently exposes the wrongs of his favored Democrat Party opponent, former U.S. Representative Jerry McNerney, Shoemaker could win an upset victory.
Another State Senate seat that Republicans might pick up is a newly-drawn open seat in Riverside and San Bernardino counties. District 31‘s primary election shows that a Republican can win it, because Republican Cynthia Navarro has, so far, received 45.8% of the counted votes despite spending hardly any money. If State Senate Republicans fund her general election campaign, Navarro could reach independents and Hispanics throughout the district with her popular message — as she outlined in this newspaper interview — of fighting crime, championing parental rights, and supporting small businessowners who provide jobs. Navarro’s Democrat opponent, “LGBTQIA+” activist Assemblyperson Sabrina Cervantes, has voted the polar opposite in Sacramento.
Still another State Senate seat in Orange County could flip Republican. This is the newly-drawn District 37 stretching from Fullerton to Laguna Niguel. In the primary election, Republican candidates (combined) received 52.9% of the vote, putting reliably-conservative-voting Steven Choi (a former state assemblyman) in the functional lead to defeat current Democrat State Senator Josh Newman in November.
U.S. House of Representatives There are more than a dozen California congressional races where the Republican U.S. House candidate or all of the Republican candidates together received at least 40% of the vote in the March 5 primary election. Can they pull off victories in November?
Let’s look at the U.S. House primary contests with non-incumbent Republicans advancing to the general election (Caution: For most of these races, I do not yet know whether the Republican is a RiNO, a seat-warmer, or a conservative, constitutional, pro-family fighter):
In Sacramento County, will the Republican Party target Democrat incumbent Ami Bera and help conservative Republican Christine Bish pull off an upset?
In Stockton/Lodi, will Republican Kevin Lincoln oust Democrat incumbent Josh Harder?
From Fresno to Bakersfield in District 20, will the more conservative Republican Mike Boudreaux beat the less conservative Republican Vince Fong in November?
In the heart of the southern San Joaquin Valley, will Republican Michael Maher oust Democrat Jim Costa in November?
In Greater Palm Springs, will Republican Ian Weeks oust Democrat incumbent Raul Ruiz in November?
In Ventura County, will Republican Michael Koslow oust Democrat incumbent Julia Brownley in November?
In San Bernardino, will Republican Tom Herman beat Democrat incumbent Pete Aguilar in November?
In District 35, will Republican Mike Cargile oust incumbent Democrat Norma Torres in November?
In District 38, will Republican Eric Ching oust incumbent Democrat Linda Sanchez in November?
In District 39, will Republican David Serpa oust incumbent Democrat Mark Takano in November?
In Orange County, will Republican patriot Scott Baugh take back this Democrat seat in November?
In San Diego County, will Republican Matt Gunderson oust incumbent Democrat Mike Levin in November?
I hope this special election update has informed you — please share with others! But most of all, please grasp the opportunities presenting themselves this election year. If moral conservatives rise up in California, Right can overcome Wrong for the benefit of all.
To do evil is like sport to a fool, But a man of understanding has wisdom. Proverbs 10:2
Let love be without hypocrisy. Abhor what is evil. Cling to what is good. Romans 12:9
RSS 2.0 Feed