Randy

SaveCalifornia.com Blog//

The Newsoms: Torture and murder ‘unwanted’ pre-born babies

Thursday, February 12, 2026, 5:41 pm | Randy Thomasson

Gavin Newsom and his wife love being alive to pursue their pleasures. Yet because they reject the Bible and the Bible’s definition of love, they hate “unwanted” preborn babies.

So, as a “good Democrat,” Governor Newsom is again using your taxpayer dollars to torture and murder tiny boys and girls inside their mommies. Sold out to the devil, Newsom conveniently forgets he was in the womb once too.


“Newsom gives $90 million to California Planned Parenthood clinics, Washington Examiner 2/11/26
:

Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-CA) signed into law on Wednesday a $90 million infusion of funds for Planned Parenthood clinics to make up for federal funding cuts from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. 

California lawmakers approved the one-time funding boost on Monday. Newsom said at the bill’s signing ceremony that it has been a “point of pride” to assist Planned Parenthood.

Gavin Newsom’s wife Jennifer just wants to celebrate abortion,” Life News 2/12/26:

Standing behind her husband, Siebel Newsom appeared visibly annoyed as Newsom fielded questions about the state’s troubled high-speed rail project and his planned trip to Munich. As the questions continued, one woman in the group of speakers began chanting “protect women, Planned Parenthood.”

Siebel Newsom could then be heard telling her husband she wanted to speak, before stepping forward and moving him aside.

“We just find it incredulous that we have Planned Parenthood here, and women are 51% of the population, and the majority of the questions, all of these questions have really been about other issues. So it’s just fascinating. You have this incredible women’s caucus and all these allies, and you’re not asking about it. And this happens over and over and over and over again,” Siebel Newsom said.

“You wonder why we have such a horrific war on women in this country, and that these guys are getting away with it, because you don’t seem to care,” Siebel Newsom added. “So I just offer that with love. But these are — you have incredible women in this room, and you have these allies. Ask about what we’re here for today, don’t you think?”

Katy Grimes of the California Globe on X on 2/12/26: “Well, we just find the reaction sanctimonious and smug. Not every woman thinks aborting babies is admirable.”

Throughout Scripture, God affirms the value of every human life — from children in the womb to the elderly … One of the most commonly quoted verses is Psalm 139:13-16, which says, “For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother’s womb. I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made; your works are wonderful, I know that full well. My frame was not hidden from you when I was made in the secret place, when I was woven together in the depths of the earth. Your eyes saw my unformed body; all the days ordained for me were written in your book before one of them came to be.” This verse is often cited to reference the biblical teaching that life begins at conception. Another verse that is often cited is Exodus 20:13, which says, “You shall not murder.” This verse is used to argue that abortion is the taking of a human life and therefore violates this commandment.
“Bible verses about abortion,” Bible Study Tools 11/8/24

Why SCOTUS didn’t overturn Newsom & Co.’s unfair and racist Prop. 50

Wednesday, February 4, 2026, 8:41 pm | Randy Thomasson

Why are Californians stuck with the unfair, racist Prop. 50?

The U.S. Supreme Court’s one-sentence denial of the Trump Administration’s emergency appeal petition on Feb. 4 means that Republican candidates for U.S. congressional districts in California will suffer confusion and loss (Feb. 9 is the start of the window for congressional candidates to file paperwork declaring their candidacies).

Why did this happen? Because the 6 “Republicans” on the U.S. Supreme Court have apparently decided to let individual states redraw congressional districts mid-term. They let Texas do it on Dec. 4, and now they’re “being consistent” to let California do it too.

Thus, the “chickens” on the nation’s high court have avoided applying to California’s Proposition 50 the “equal protection” or “due process” clauses of the 14th Amendment and the 15th Amendment’s prohibition of voting laws elevating “race” and “color” above others.

Hopefully, President Donald Trump is learning that he needs to nominate constitutional fighters, not politically-correct “conservatives,” like he did his first term. For there’s a big difference between Texas getting rid of racist maps and California promoting racism and breaking other laws in its Prop. 50 scheme.

SCOTUS’s cowardly deed means California Republicans will likely lose five congressional seats. And while some principled conservatives are happy to get rid of some RINOs, SaveCalifornia.com has consistently opposed Prop. 50 for its unfair gerrymandering.

As for the Republican majority in the U.S. House of Representatives, I think it will likely hold this year, since there are more Republican states doing redistricting than Democrat Party states. But since Congress has so many RINOS — Republicans In Name Only — who vote for the Swamp and with the Democrats — the bigger question is, will our Republic hold?

It’s going to be a wild and vitally important election year — and your active participation is definitely needed!

More on this story and issue:

SCOTUS Blog: “Supreme Court allows California to use congressional map benefitting Democrats”

California Globe: “Supreme Court rejects GOP bid to block California’s Prop 50 redistricting scheme”

Los Angeles Times: “Supreme Court, with no dissents, rejects GOP challenge to California’s new election map”

USA Today: “7 states tinker with congressional maps after California, Texas changes”

SaveCalifornia.com 2025: “Why the unfair, corrupt Prop. 50 passed”

Contrary to House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries’ nutty claim that Republicans are trying to “steal the midterm elections” by redistricting in Texas, state legislators there are trying to correct what the Justice Department correctly calls “unconstitutional racially based” gerrymanders … Contrary to the discrimination claims they’re making in the press, it is these errant Democrats—not Republicans—who think there is nothing wrong with judging how people will vote based on the color of their skin and who want to preserve the racist redistricting.
Election law expert Hans von Spakovsky in the Daily Signal, Aug. 6, 2025

We were all in the womb once

Thursday, January 22, 2026, 7:29 pm | Randy Thomasson

Are babies in the womb human beings?

This is the singularly most important question about whether it’s acceptable to abort a pregnancy. For if what the Left calls “tissue” is actually a little human being, then abortion is murder and never justified.

WATCH VIDEO: Abortion survivor Gianna Jessen testimony before Congress in 2017

This is the time of year when we need to remember the babies. Because the wrongly-decided Roe v. Wade baby-killing ruling was handed down on January 22, 1973.

This is the time of year when we need to remember the babies. Because the wrongly-decided Roe v. Wade baby-killing ruling was handed down on January 22, 1973.

And even though Roe is no more (it was rightly struck down in 2022), and we now have pro-life and pro-abortion states — in California, there are more abortions than ever.

The ruling Democrat Party politicians here have increased both surgical abortions and chemical abortions, and are bringing innocent babies (inside their mothers) from other states to then kill in California with taxpayer dollars.

See documentation of California’s pro-abortion laws:

Students for Life
Americans United for Life
LegalClarity.org
SaveCalifornia.com (see abortion expansion bills 2021-2025)

So, I encourage you — think about and value the humanity of babies in the womb. Remember, we were all there once. And this isn’t a little, growing dog or cat or kangaroo — it’s a developing baby HUMAN BEING, who deserves nurture, love, and protection.

… at the time the 14th Amendment was enacted, virtually every state understood and accepted that the legal phrase “person” included preborn life. Abortion was seen as the murder of a child. Objections to including preborn children under 14th Amendment protections, therefore, are nothing more than fundamental misunderstandings of the amendment.
Live Action: Why the 14th Amendment protects preborn human beings