Thursday, November 7, 2024, 7:31 am | Randy Thomasson
Sadly, the sexual anarchy dressed up as “marriage equality” has passed in California, where too many voters are dumbed down and loathe to do critical thinking or their own research.
California’s corrupt, immoral Democrat Party officials made Prop. 3 easy to pass.
Instead of telling voters the facts — that Prop. 3 opens the door to legalize unrestricted child marriages, incestuous marriages, polygamy, bigamy, even “marriages” with animals and objects — the Democrat Party’s Attorney General, Secretary of State, and Legislative Analyst this summer conspired to write in the “Official Voter Information Guide” that Prop. 3 only “updates the Constitution to match what the federal courts have said about who can marry” and “there would be no change in who can marry.” Lies, lies, and more lies.
What’s next: Starting as soon as 2025, expect California state lawsuits using Prop. 3 to legalize marriages with whomever and whatever. Fear for the boys and girls who’ll be roped into unrestricted child marriages (parental permission no longer required), and feel for the young women deceived into polygamous marriages with multiple spouses. What’s more, perverse organizations in other Democrat-Party-controlled states will want to replicate marriage anarchy there too.
Thank you for standing with SaveCalifornia.com as we fought hard to inform reasonable Californians about how Prop. 3 collided with their values.
For the love of God and people, we informed as many Californians as we could about Prop. 3’s legal subjectivity, and urged them to send their friends to LearnAboutProp3.com.
If our side had $5 to $10 million to spend, the outcome could have been different. But evil has prevailed. Their scheme was set, the deception done, the lies led, fools fell for it, and human beings will indeed be harmed.
Other Facts:
In 2023, 88 Democrats + 10 RINOs placed ACA 5 on the ballot to become Prop. 3 (the 10 Republicans were Juan Alanis, Phillip Chen, Laurie Davies, Diane Dixon, Bill Essayli, Josh Hoover, Devon Mathis, Marie Waldron, Greg Wallis, and Scott Wilk)
Wealthy homosexual activists spent at least $1.43 million on lie-based ads to expand the reach of their Democrat Party official’s false ballot descriptions
California clergy did not organize and rise up against Prop. 3 like they did in 2008 to protect man-woman marriage licenses with Prop. 8
Tuesday, October 22, 2024, 6:12 pm | Randy Thomasson
Because election fraud is real, I urge you to vote early, in person, and with a paper ballot.
Stop and realize the overall benefit is having the least number of strangers’ hands on your ballot.
As we know, nationwide, “discrepancies” have occurred with “election-day ballots” and “ballots counted after election day” (ballots in envelopes) and wherever computerized machines do the counting (and adding and subtracting).
Yes, because of human sin and domestic enemies (New Communist Democrats), there’s a real problem with election integrity, not just in California, but nationwide.
So it behooves you to avoid computers, avoid election-day voting, and avoid submitting your ballot in an envelope. This gives your ballot its best chance to count — unmolested.
To help honest voters on the “Left Coast,” Election Integrity Project, California is recommending, based on a new law in effect here in 2024, for “voters to cast their marked vote by mail ballot at the polls without the security envelope.”
Again, this method means having the least number of strangers’ hands on your ballot, avoiding manipulatable computers, and avoiding the election fraud done on election-day ballots and ballots in sealed envelopes opened after the polls close on election day.
Californians’ ability to vote this way is based on AB 626, which went into effect this year, reading: “A voter may vote their vote by mail ballot, without the identification envelope, in person at the polling place designated for the voter’s home precinct or at a vote center.”
However, this option might not be available in all of California’s 58 counties. Because AB 626 is conditional on the county elections office being set up to handle it.
What we know is that the 29 California counties participating in the Voter’s Choice Act of 2016 — a pre-Covid tyranny bill that exchanged neighborhood polling places for several “vote centers” in a county, where you can vote in person — have already agreed per the Act’s provisions to accept voters casting their already-marked vote-by-mail ballots, in person, without the “security envelope.”
As EIP California explains, “Voter’s Choice Act and Electronic Poll Book counties … must now allow voters to cast their marked vote by mail ballot at the polls without the security envelope.”
The 29 California counties participating in the Voter’s Choice Act (VCA), which includes several physical voting centers and letting voters cast paper ballots, are Alameda, Amador, Butte, Calaveras, El Dorado, Fresno, Humboldt, Kings, Los Angeles, Madera, Marin, Mariposa, Merced, Napa, Nevada, Orange, Placer, Riverside, Sacramento, San Benito, San Diego, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, Sonoma, Stanislaus, Tuolumne, Ventura, Yolo.
We don’t know how many counties, in addition to this, are Electronic Poll Book counties that will also accept marked vote-by-mail ballots without the envelope. Your best bet is to call your own county elections office, and tell them you want to vote in person using a paper ballot and how to do it.
Where election fraud and New Communist Democrat thievery exist, you must do what you can to secure your ballot. Yes, liberals like fraud-inviting mail-in ballots. Yet you can be glad you can now cast your marked vote-by-mail ballot in person without the envelope.
Regarding Step 4 (above), some election integrity activists refuse to use a Ballot Marking Device (BMD) and also report not all vote centers have paper ballot scanners. They say instead of using a BMD (which, nowadays, is mostly for people with disabilities), they’ll leave for another vote center that will serve them.
Your best bet in your county is to go to your election headquarters to vote in person — and early — and by casting your already-marked vote-by-mail ballot as your paper ballot, you’ll create a “verified paper record” and avoid your ballot being “trucked” from one place to another, thus making it harder for domestic enemies to manipulate your ballot.
Please don’t regard this as too complex. Because when election fraud is real and you want your vote to count, it’s going to take a little more effort. Join me in being glad 2024 has ushered in a new law, where half or more of California’s counties will let you cast the most secure ballot you can.
Monday, September 2, 2024, 10:55 am | Randy Thomasson
Have you considered why California has such bad government? There are powerful forces supporting the New Communist Democrats, who are now three-fourths of both houses of the State Legislature, and who control all the statewide constitutional offices.
Yet the evil forces leading here aren’t the “useful idiots” (foolish voters dumbed down by the “public” schools, illegal aliens, self-centered government employees, etc.).
No, the wealthy, influential entities sustaining the iron-fisted rule of New Communist Democrats in California are both government unions and private unions. Don’t believe it? See how unions fund the Democrat Party Machine:
SEIU, California’s largest private- and public-sector union, nearly exclusively supports Democrat Party candidates and liberal causes. SEIU has also been the top union contributing to federal campaigns, donating $232,694,670 between 1990 and 2016, 99 percent of which went to Democrats.
As reported in late 2023: “Democrats and their causes receive 95.7% of the cash from unions’ political action committees. In 2021-22 the Big Four gave more than $29 million to the SEIU’s United We Can super PAC and the NEA Advocacy Fund super PAC which support federal candidates for office. Another $16 million went to wealthy climate crusader Tom Steyer’s leftwing For Our Future Pac. Some $3 million went to Fair Share Massachusetts which supports a state wealth tax.
“Big money also flows at the state level, where public unions all but run many state capitals. In 2021-2022, the four largest government unions spent $27.9 million in Illinois, $24.9 million in California, $13.2 million in Minnesota and $12.1 million in Pennsylvania.
“Nearly 60% of unions’ annual political spending, or some $400 million, came from membership dues and about 40% came from unions’ political action committees for which workers make voluntary contributions for politics. While unions can’t send dues money directly to candidates, workers might be surprised to see their paycheck deductions funneled to outside groups that spend money on politics (including those that deploy the money out of state).”
As reported in 2021 after Gavin Newsom “won” his recall election, “Organized labor donated at least $25.7 million — or more than one-third of the total the governor raised to keep his job. Unions, of course, have deep ties to the Democratic Party and a stake in nearly every aspect of state government.”
Because of how unions and their “owned politicians” put deceptive tax hikes on the ballot, and since union bosses regularly spend union dues to elect and re-elect corrupt Democrat Party politicians, if you’re a union member, please resign from your union.
Remember, you have strong, fundamental free-speech rights to not be coerced into supporting objectionable union politics. Now that you’ve unpeeled the onion and found the rotten core, will you stop “feeding” the beast?
See how to resign from the union and still keep your job and benefits:
The biblical view of man is work-oriented. It affirms that man was placed on the earth to subdue it to the glory of God (Gen. 1:28; 9:1-7). It is not each man’s right to work. It is his duty to work. What is his lawful right is his right to compete for the job he wants, his right to compete for the labor services he wishes to purchase. No one has a right to my job, including me. Anyone should have the right to compete for my job, including me. And I have the right to compete for his. “A Christian view of labor unions,” Gary North, July 1, 1978
RSS 2.0 Feed