,
 

California Legislation Center//

  • Print

Welcome to the SaveCalifornia.com Legislation Center

Updated March 19, 2026

This is where SaveCalifornia.com tracks the worst bills authored by Democrat Party state legislators, who are 3/4th of both the California Assembly and State Senate, also controlling the committees and floors. More bills will be added as they are amended or become known to us.

AB 1540 by 18 Democrats (half of them homosexual activists + one Republican, Greg Wallis of the Greater Palm Springs area) would require the State of California to provide the technology and funding for an "LGBTQ+ suicide and crisis hotline," where any California child can call or text to be positively influenced into transsexuality "counseling," treatments, and sexual contacts. Yet the evidence shows this pro-"trans" agenda will result in more youth suicides.

Status | Votes: AB 1540 is on the Assembly floor for a two-thirds vote (requiring 54 yes votes out of 80 members), after its March 17 passage by the Assembly Health Committee (Democrats yes; Republicans no, except Republican Phillip Chen was recorded as non-voting). 

- - - - -

AB 1578 by "LGBTQIA+" activist Corey Jackson of Moreno Valley/Perris/San Jacinto would force all state and local officials into "antihate speech training and education"; however, the bill never defines "hate speech" and neither does California law. However, the Penal Code, Section 422.56 promotes "hate crimes" based on “gender identity and gender expression." This is what AB 1578's forced speech is pushing. 

Status | Votes: AB 1578 on March 9 was double-referred to the Local Government Committee and the Government Organization Committee.

- - - - -

AB 1876 by pro-"LGBTQIA+" Democrat Party assemblywoman Dawn Addis of the Central Coast would force health insurers to fund "sex change" procedures (puberty blockers, cross sex hormones, double mastectomies, etc.) for children. The bill, of course, calls this irreversible maiming of children, who are not mature enough to give informed consent, "gender affirming care."

"Children cannot consent to puberty blocker trial, Streeting admits" (U.K. 12/17/25)
Billboard Chris: Children Cannot Consent to Puberty Blockers (UCLA, 2025)
Study: No evidence that puberty blockers improve patients’ mental health (10/23/24)

From the Legislative Counsel's Digest of AB 1876, as introduced on February 12, 2026: "The bill would define discrimination on the basis of sex for those purposes to include, among other things, sex characteristics, including intersex traits, pregnancy, and gender identity. The bill would prohibit a health care service plan or health insurer from taking specified actions relating to providing access to health programs and activities, including, but not limited to, denying or limiting health care services to an individual based upon the individual’s sex assigned at birth, gender identity, or gender otherwise recorded."

Status | Votes: AB 1876 has been sent to the Assembly Judiciary Committee after its March 17 passage by the Assembly Health Committee (Democrats for; Republicans against). 

- - - - -

AB 1900 by 20 Democrat Party legislators would eliminate private health insurance and put all health care under the direct control of the state government. This foolish bill would result in higher taxes, long waits, rationing, fewer doctors, and less treatment. See documentation

Status | Votes: AB 1900 has not yet been assigned to a committee.

- - - - -

AB 2164 by 23 pro-abortion Democrat Party legislators would shield from any legal liability those who kidnap minors in other states to bring them to California for an abortion or "sex changes." This bad bill also empowers California's governor to "extradite" back to California anyone charged in another state for illegally pushing a California abortion or California "sex change" upon a minor.

Status | Votes: AB 2164 is scheduled for an April 7 hearing in the Assembly Public Safety Committee.

- - - - -

AB 2563 by Democrat Party assemblywoman Blanca Pacheco of Downey/Norwalk/La Mirada in southeast Los Angeles County would redefine "sex discrimination" to advance baby-killing (abortion) and transsexuality (for both children and adults).

From AB 2563 as introduced on February 20, 2026:

(1) “Discrimination” includes, but is not limited to, harassment.
(2) “Pregnancy or related medical conditions” includes, but is not limited to, childbirth, abortion, lactation, miscarriage, fertility, and contraception.
(3) “Sex discrimination” includes, but is not limited to, discrimination based on any of the following actual or perceived characteristics or actions:
(A) Assigned sex or gender category, including female, male, or nonbinary.
(B) Degree of conformity to sex or gender stereotypes.
(C) Gender, including gender identity, gender expression, and access to, and use of, gender affirming care and other related health care.
(D) Pregnancy or related medical conditions.
(E) Decisionmaking, access to care, or potential or actual use of a drug, device, product, or service relating to pregnancy or related medical conditions.
(F) Sexual orientation.
(G) Variations in sex characteristics, including intersex traits or differences in sex development.

Status | Votes: AB 2563 is scheduled for an April 7 hearing in the Assembly Judiciary Committee.
 
- - - - -

ACA 7 by Democrat Party Assemblyman Corey Jackson would change the California Constitution to permit blatant discrimination, based on race, sex, color, ethnicity, and national origin, in all aspects of K-12 "public" schools and in all employment and positions (including tenure and promotions) in community colleges and UC and CSU university systems.

Status | Votes: This Assembly Constitutional Amendment is in the State Senate awaiting committee assignment, after the ruling Democrats powered this two-thirds measure through the Assembly (passing with the bare minimum of 54 yes votes) in February of this year (nearly all Dems voted yes; most Republicans voted no, but six Republicans abstained). ACA 7 was dead all last year, not even receiving a committee vote.

- - - - -

 
SB 934 by 22 pro-"LGBTQIA+" Democrat Party legislators is, at this time, only an "intent" bill. This bad bill basically says pro-family counselors helping children and adults overcome homosexual or transsexual delusions should be sued for "damages."

Status | Votes: SB 934 on February 11 was sent to the Senate Rules Committee for assignment.
 
- - - - -

SB 1114 by "LGBTQIA+" activist state senator Christopher Cabaldon of Yolo/Solano/Napa/Sonoma counties redefines "SOGISC" and tries to hide documentation of "a person’s transgender or intersex status."

SB 1114 reads, in part, as introduced February 17, 2026:

8310.8. (a) For the purposes of this section, “information pertaining to SOGISC” means information pertaining to any of the following:

1) A person’s sexual orientation identity.
(2) A person’s gender identity or gender expression.
(3) A person’s identification as intersex, or identification as possessing sex characteristics that vary from those typically associated with a person’s sex assigned at birth.
(4) For purposes of paragraph (4) of subdivision (d), information pertaining to SOGISC also includes information that could reasonably be used to infer a person’s transgender or intersex status, including any of the following:
(A) A person’s self-identification as transgender, nonbinary, or a gender other than man/male or woman/female.
(B) Information about a person’s gender identity and their sex assigned at birth that is stored or disclosed in a manner that may result in a person being classified as transgender or intersex.
(C) Administrative records of gender marker change or documentation submitted in conjunction with a request for gender marker change.
(D) Medical information related to transgender or intersex status not otherwise protected under the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) (Public Law 104-191) and the California Confidentiality of Medical Information Act (CMIA) (Part 2.6 (commencing with Section 56) of Division 1 of the Civil Code).

Status | Votes: SB 1114 is scheduled for a March 24 hearing in the Senate Governmental Organization Committee.

See our 6/5/25 special report: Who are the RINOs?

Legislative Archive

2025's worst bills and their outcomes

2024's worst bills and their outcomes

2023's worst bills and their outcomes

2022's worst bills and their outcomes

2021's worst bills and their outcomes

Please share this Legislative Center with your friends so they realize the anti-family agenda of California's Democrat Party legislators and their RINO accomplices.