SaveCalifornia.com Blog//

Archives for the ‘California Constitution’ Category

Which of Newsom’s unconstitutional bill signings can be struck down?

Saturday, October 1, 2022, 2:47 pm | Randy Thomasson

By the end of his September 30 signing deadline, tyrannical Democrat Governor Gavin Newsom had signed hundreds of foolish, unconstitutional, and downright evil bills.

I’m reporting this not to depress you, but so you become so concerned that you’ll share this information with your friends and reasonable acquaintances, so they’ll become energized to vote this election.

While the final week of bill signings saw Newsom’s vetoes of two big, anti-parent bills — SB 70 and AB 1940 (he vetoed them because of their huge, ongoing costs), he signed the rest of the anti-parent bills, and many unconstitutional bills.

Here are the big ones that could and should be struck down:

AB 587 pressures social media companies to censor speech the Democrat-controlled government doesn’t like, such as, the truth about “Covid vaccines,” the harm of the “LGBTQIA+” agenda, the reality of election fraud, and the facts about life in the womb. AB 587 actually forces online platforms to report to the government whether they are blocking “Hate speech or racism,” “Extremism or radicalization,” “Disinformation or misinformation,” and, if so, how. These subjective terms are designed to censor your free speech, but the supporters of AB 587 think they can avoid constitutional scrutiny by forcing social media platforms to do their dirty work. Yet their fingerprints are all over this attack on the First Amendment. The larger conservative or free-speech-supporting platforms, such as Gab, Telegram, Truth Social, Rumble, Gettr, and Frank Speech should sue in federal court to repel this unconstitutional attack upon them and us.

AB 1797 will create a statewide vaccine registry, mandating most Californians’ vaccine status and “race and ethnicity” be reported to the government by “health care providers and other agencies, including schools, childcare facilities, family childcare homes, and county human services agencies.” AB 1797 is ripe for both a state and federal lawsuit, because it violates the California State Constitution’s explicit right to privacy. There’s even a California Supreme Court ruling from 1975 prohibiting any surveillance of Californians when there’s no suspected illegal activity. In addition, there’s California’s voter-approved prohibition of racial preferences (Proposition 209 from 1996). There are also federal medical privacy laws.

AB 2098 will punish doctors who have studied and tell their patients the facts about Covid (the non-threat of the “variants,”) the efficacy of natural and traditional therapeutics, and the risk of injury and death from the unsafe “Covid vaccines.” Because AB 2098 tramples medical ethics, informed consent, and the doctor-patient relationship, it must be sued and struck down in federal court. Specifically, AB 2098 infringes on the fundamental guarantee of freedom of speech in the U.S. and California constitutions. And professionally, it destroys the ethic of a second opinion — when a doctor disagrees with another doctor or even differs from so-called “consensus.”

AB 2223 permitting the killing of already-born infants and toddlers by prohibiting and punishing investigations by authorities of deaths occurring during the “perinatal period” (which a world-renowned child development authority said extends “18 to 24 months after the birth of the child.” This infanticide bill AB 2223 deserves a federal lawsuit based on the 14th Amendment‘s guarantee that States cannot “deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” Who are the constitutional California district attorneys and sheriff-coroners who will sue AB 2223 on its face?

AB 2229 will discriminate against law enforcement officer candidates (police officers, sheriff’s deputies, California Highway Patrol officers) who are practicing Christians, Catholics, Muslims, and conservative Jews. As the Legislative Counsel describes AB 2229: “Existing law requires peace officers in this state to meet specified minimum standards, including, among other requirements, that peace officers be evaluated by a physician and surgeon or psychologist and found to be free from any physical, emotional, or mental condition that might adversely affect the exercise of the powers of a peace officer. This bill would require that evaluation to include bias against race or ethnicity, gender, nationality, religion, disability, or sexual orientation.” According to current California law: “Sexual orientation” means heterosexuality, homosexuality, or bisexuality … “Gender” means sex, and includes a person’s gender identity and gender expression. “Gender expression” means a person’s gender-related appearance and behavior whether or not stereotypically associated with the person’s assigned sex at birth.” AB 2229 needs to be sued in federal court by law enforcement candidates who will be, or have been, discriminated against because of their religious values, on the strength of the 1964 U.S. Civil Rights Act.

SB 107 empowers “LGBTQIA+” activists to legally kidnap and mutilate kids. If parents in other states want to help their boys or girls overcome sexual confusion, “LGBTQIA+” groups will scheme to bring these children to California, then their attorneys will go to court and use SB 107 to give California “jurisdiction” over the children, and then California tax-funded hormone injections and “sex change” surgeries will follow. “Counseling” is part of this process, during which SB 107 will convince biological girls they’re “boys” and biological boys they’re “girls” (SB 107 calls this “gender-affirming mental health care”), then the hormone injections and irreversible “sex change” operations (which SB 107 calls “gender-affirming health care”) will follow. Federal lawsuits should be filed by state attorney generals in Republican states for this blatant violation of parental consent laws and other laws in their states. And it might require the U.S. Supreme Court to deliver a clarifying parental rights decision.

Other anti-parent bills that were signed — SB 1184, SB 1419, and SB 1479 — probably have no lawsuit potential (unless SCOTUS delivers a crystal-clear parental decision that California parents can use to regain their rights).

Religious hospitals might become exempt from SB 923‘s tyrannical transsexual indoctrination of health care providers if they sue and win in federal court on religious-freedom grounds. But pro-abortion bills, such as SB 1375 permitting nurses to kill pre-born babies and the 11 other pro-abortion bills Newsom signed, will survive all legal challenges because pro-abortion Democrat and RINO governors have built an unconstitutional, pro-abortion California Supreme Court, which callously guards “abortion rights.”

Overall, Newsom signed 997 bills this year, which were from Democrat authors or Democrat committees around 90% of the time.

One of his worst vetoes was of a Republican bill that Democrat-run committees actually passed, a bill to limit the governor’s emergency powers. Newsom arrogantly vetoed it.

When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice;
But when a wicked man rules, the people groan.

Proverbs 29:2

Because of the transgression of a land, many are its princes;
But by a man of understanding and knowledge
Right will be prolonged.

Proverbs 28:2

TOP ALERT: 5 awful bills Newsom might veto

Friday, September 9, 2022, 10:52 am | Randy Thomasson

September 30, 2022 UPDATE: Newsom is done signing many bad bills, including the bills to continue Covid tyranny (AB 1797, AB 2098, SB 1479). If this man’s not stopped, we need to try to stop several unconstitutional bills with federal lawsuits (AB 1797, AB 2098, AB 587, AB 2223, SB 107).

September 28, 2022 UPDATE: Because of their huge price tags, Democrat Governor Gavin Newsom has vetoed AB 1940 (anti-parent school-based clinics) and SB 70 (mandatory kindergarten). Please keep calling and emailing against the Covid tyranny bills AB 2098 and SB 1479!

September 23, 2022 UPDATE: Based on Newsom’s string of “fiscally prudent” veto messages, we’ve added AB 1940 to the other four anti-family bills we believe can be vetoed by this tyrannical, unconstitutional, left-wing Democrat governor. Because AB 1940, which SaveCalifornia.com fought against this summer, would spend tens of millions of taxpayer dollars annually on “school-based clinics,” pushing all types of garbage upon children behind parents’ backs.

It’s a dire sitution, so fight where you can win!

Even though Gavin Newsom idolizes abortion, “LGBTQIA+,” and environmental wackoism, of the hundreds of bad Democrat bills on his desk, there are 5 really bad ones he could veto, with your help:

AB 1940 funding anti-parent “school-based clinics” VETOED Sept. 27
AB 1797 creating a statewide vaccine registry SIGNED Sept. 27
AB 2098 punishing the free speech of doctors who correctly analyzed Covid SIGNED Sept. 30
SB 1479 requiring a “Covid testing plan” at all K-12 government schools SIGNED Sept. 29
SB 70 eliminating parental choice on kindergarten VETOED Sept. 25

There’s momentum brewing against AB 2098, the unconstitutional, punish-good-doctors bill — even the San Francisco Chronicle reports public opposition. And there’s a reasonable fight over SB 70’s mandatory kindergarten. So please take quick action now!

Urge vetoes of these bad bills: Phone 916-445-2841 (M-F 9a-5p) | Webform (send one message for each veto request). For most of the bills passed by Wednesday (the last day of the legislative session), Newsom has until September 30 to sign or veto. See details of these vetoable bills at the SaveCalifornia.com Legislation Center.

See then that you walk circumspectly, not as fools but as wise, redeeming the time, wbecause the days are evil.
The Bible, Ephesians 5:15-16

Final chance to stop infanticide and punishment of good doctors

Tuesday, August 30, 2022, 10:33 am | Randy Thomasson

This is your final legislative alert as the California State Legislature crashes to a close at the end of Wednesday, August 31. Please call your assemblymember today!

On Monday, August 29, the Democrat-controlled State Senate passed AB 2223 legalizing infanticide and passed AB 2098 punishing good doctors who tell the truth about Covid. Also Monday, the Democrat-controlled State Assembly passed SB 1419 prohibiting parents from viewing all of their children’s health records.

See our August 29 floor alerts, delivered to 58 of 80 assemblymembers: AB 2098 (on Assembly floor) | AB 2223 (on Assembly floor) | SB 1419 (passed Assembly on Monday).

There is still a chance to defeat the infanticide and punish-good-doctors bills on the Assembly floor. But you must threaten Republican legislators to repent of their unloving silence (which resulted in SB 1419 passing Monday on a second attempt — see more).

If you’re seeing this on Tuesday, August 30, please drop everything and call your own California state assemblymember:

If your own assemblymember is a Republican, you must be very tough — because they don’t want to speak (this whole month, hundreds of bad Democrat bills, on moral, social, even fiscal issues, have passed without a single Republican standing and speaking to expose the harm). Leave a message for your Republican legislator, such as. “You need to stand and speak against AB 2098 punishing good doctors and AB 2223 legalizing infanticide. If you refuse to stand and speak, you’ll lose my support.”

If your own assemblymember is a Democrat, leave a message for him or her, saying: “Oppose AB 2098, which is an unfair, unconstitutional bill punishing good doctors who have been proven correct — Covid vaccines do not prevent infection or transmission. Also oppose AB 2223, which legalizes infanticide by prohibiting law enforcement from investigating infant deaths. I will be watching your votes.” 

Let love be without hypocrisy.
Abhor what is evil.
Cling to what is good.
Romans 12:9