SaveCalifornia.com Blog//

Archives for the ‘Election’ Category

EMERGENCY: Urge Newsom to drop his ‘vaccine verification’ notion

Saturday, June 12, 2021, 10:28 pm | Randy Thomasson
Please participate in this emergency alert to protect your humanity, your health, and your life. Vigorously oppose Gavin Newsom’s plan to create a “vaccine verification” tool!

Problem 1: The possibility of experiencing an adverse reaction, including injury or death, is real for anyone being injected with the experimental biological agents misnamed “Covid vaccines.” Seeing the stark evidence of this, and learning of many other serious problems of these injected agents, provides legitimate opposition to taking the “jab.” Therefore, it is inhuman, against medical ethics, and against informed consent to force or coerce anyone to be injected with what they don’t want going into their body.

Problem 2: The threat of “vaccine verification” is real. Otherwise known as a “vaccine passport,” “vaccine verification” prevents non-vaccinated people from entering stores, entering government buildings, participation in events, and from traveling with others by plane, train, bus, taxi, and much more. “Vaccine verification” and “vaccine passports” segregate and divide people into “vaccinated” and “unvaccinated.” This is medical discrimination to the max.

Problem 3: On Friday, June 11, Democrat Governor Gavin Newsom responded to a reporter’s question, saying his administration is working on the concept of providing an electronic “vaccine verification” tool for businesses (which would segregate and inhumanly discriminate against those who have refused the “jab”). Newsom said, “We would look to help support those efforts and modernize the opportunities, and we’ll be making some announcements very shortly in that space.” Update: On Monday, June 14, Newsom told reporters: “It’s not a passport, it’s not a requirement, it’s just the ability now to have an electronic version of that paper version, so you’ll hear more about that in the next couple of days.”
Problem 4: Newsom also engaged in blatant deception, saying, “There is no mandate, no requirement, no passport,” yet noting California businesses could take the State’s invention and implement it (against innocent, conscientious people). Figuratively speaking, Newsom wants to make a bomb to give to terrorists and then deny any criminal involvement, saying he “only” made the bomb and gave it to others. This is the definition of being an accessory to a crime. Don’t let Newsom get away with this doublespeak!


Under the shadow of the recall election, Newsom has taken pains to say his plan is not a “vaccine passport,” which has negative connotations. So act now. Seize this opportunity to flood him with calls and emails!

Tell him this: Drop your plans for a “vaccine verification” tool, which is a “vaccine passport” segregating and discriminating against people who do not consent to any of the “Covid vaccines.” This passport/verification plan would also harm a sizable number of Californians, including the elderly, who do not have smart phones. “Vaccine verification” would deny many people’s basic human rights to shop, socialize, travel, and receive essential services. it would also discourage tourists from states or countries without “vaccine verification.” Please drop your bad idea, which would hurt real people!

Use Newsom’s webform by selecting “Comment” and “Covid-19” and a “Con” position. Please also call Newsom’s office at 916-445-2841 Monday – Friday 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. for a live person to take your message.

“CDC: 5,888 DEAD 329,021 Injuries from COVID-19 Shots – More than Previous 29 Years of VAERS Vaccine Deaths” Health Impact News, June 12, 2021

New Alert: Tell Newsom to override Cal/OSHA on masks

Friday, June 4, 2021, 8:53 am | Randy Thomasson


We lost a battle, but we might win this war!

In their 8-hour “virtual meeting,” after hearing from nearly 100 opponents, the Cal/OSHA board on Thursday initially voted 4-3 to reject their staff’s tyrannical scheme to pressure virtually all indoor employers to coerce their workers to uselessly and harmfully “mask up,” “social distance,” get tested and get injected with a dangerous experimental biological agent.

But then, with some deceitful massaging by the chairman, the Cal/OSHA board unanimously approved the plan on a “temporary” basis. So it passed and is scheduled to go in effect in a couple weeks — unless Governor Newsom overrides it.

Cal/OSHA’s act is unconstitutional, unscientific, thieving, and socialist. The tyrannical arrogance of some of these Democrat board members shows they don’t mind trampling your property rights, mandating or coercing dangerous, completely unnecessary injections.

See this Big-Government gobbledygook from leftist board member Barbara Burgel, who said:

….she strongly believes “that employers who have the legal responsibility to provide a safe and healthy workplace” and need “to continue to protect their workers in this COVID pandemic, which is not totally controlled.”

In other words, the government is in charge of and can take over your business operations, what they don’t mandate they’ll coerce with fear, and they actually believes the lie that no societal normalcy is “permitted” until the virus is totally extinguished. The devil would be proud! Because the virus has already burned itself out and property rights and human rights are not the Left’s toys to play with and squash if they so desire.

Thank you to our SaveCalifornia.com friends who called Newsom and Cal/OSHA. The business owners and business leaders who spoke against Cal/OSHA’s plan to continue oppressive Covid restrictions beyond June 15 expressed great concern over the government’s continued abuse of, and promoting strife within, real-world working environments:

Others, though, said they were concerned that drawing a distinction between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated could essentially create two classes of workers and an environment where some employees were subject to harassment. They worried that requirements could be discriminatory or attention would be drawn to private medical decisions. “One of our members is considering placing stickers on ID badges to determine who is vaccinated and who is not. Many are considering creating separate floors,” said Helen Cleary, director of the Phylmar Regulatory Roundtable, a business coalition. “The unintended consequences of these provisions are serious and they cannot be understated. They have the potential to negatively impact thousands of workers in the state.”


Pro-lockdown Democrat Governor Gavin Newsom, besieged by a looming recall election and science regularly proving him wrong, has said he would end “most” of his Covid “restrictions” on June 15. This puts him at odds with Cal/OSHA. But Newsom can “override” Cal/OSHA with yet another of his “emergency power” orders. He knows it and the media is reporting this option. So the pressure is mounting and need to multiply!

1. Please use Newsom’s web form (choose “Comment” and “Covid-19”) to tell him: “Issue an executive order overriding Cal/OSHA. You need to reopen all of California on June 15.”
2. Also call Newsom’s constituent services number at 916-445-2841 Friday, June 4 from 9am to 5pm. Choose the option to leave a message. He needs a flood of phone calls!

For more on this issue, see my May 31 blog

Recall math: How to get a good governor

Saturday, May 1, 2021, 11:38 am | Randy Thomasson

SaveCalifornia.com provides this solely for educational purposes
and does not support or oppose candidates for public office

Do you want a good governor again?

Given the qualification of Gavin Newsom Recall petition signatures, the evidence of tremendous harm done by this governor to California families, and the fact that Newsom is a true Democrat reflecting the unconstitutional insanity of his party, a constitutional, good governor will be the opposite of Newsom.

In the expected Fall 2021 recall election, Ballot 1 will be yes or no on firing Newsom, and Ballot 2 will be all the candidates who want to replace him as governor. And on the second ballot, the candidate receiving the most votes (a plurality) will win.

Which presents a challenge for California conservatives, since there is a leading liberal “Republican,” who’s a former big-city mayor, on Ballot 2. This “socially liberal” man, who’s marched in “LGBTQIA+” parades and supported awarding U.S. citizenship to illegal aliens, has already received the most endorsements of Republican state legislators. Did they know what they were endorsing?

Therefore, the only way to elect a true conservative is for California conservatives to rally behind the strongest conservative. Remember, a constitutional, good governor is someone you can trust to veto ALL the bad bills the Democrat-controlled State Legislature puts on his desk.

The problem is real, because with multiple “conservatives” running, they’re apt to split the conservative vote, which would propel the liberal “Republican” to victory. Consider the 2003 recall election, when liberal “Republican” Arnold Schwarzenegger deceived many conservatives (he signed bills imposing school sexual indoctrination and gave Californians a big tax hike and the elimination of party primaries).

Let’s do the math. Consider a scenario where two conservative candidates receive 30% and 25%. But the split conservative vote (totaling 55%) hands the victory to the liberal “Republican,” who wins with 35%. So, if you don’t want kick yourself later, calculate correctly now. If you want a constitutional, good governor, you can’t split conservative voters, and you must only support the leading conservative candidate (so he can be the top vote-getter). Because the hard math tells us minor conservative candidates will only help the liberal “Republican” win, by draining votes from the leading conservative.

Some of you want to know how I’ll vote. Well, I can tell you my standards for voting on the second ballot, which will contain many candidates who want to replace Newsom. I will vote for a candidate who:

  1. Has reliable moral, social, fiscal, conservative, constitutional values
  2. Is not a homosexual or transsexual (which is antithetical to the above values)
  3. Can win (acknowledged this September to be one of the three leading candidates)

To help you start your own research, here’s information on the top three declared candidates, in alphabetical order:

Ontheissues.org database reports John Cox is a “Libertarian-Leaning Conservative”
Unreliable Wikipedia describes Kevin Faulconer’s liberal social issues
Ontheissues.org database reports Doug Ose is a “Moderate Libertarian Conservative” 

Quite practically, a constitutional, good governor is somebody you trust to veto ALL the bad bills that the Democrat-controlled Legislature sends to his desk.

When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice;
But when a wicked man rules, the people groan…
The king establishes the land by justice,
But he who receives bribes overthrows it.
Proverbs 29: 2 and 4