Wednesday, February 4, 2026, 8:41 pm | Randy Thomasson
Why are Californians stuck with the unfair, racist Prop. 50?
The U.S. Supreme Court’s one-sentence denial of the Trump Administration’s emergency appeal petition on Feb. 4 means that Republican candidates for U.S. congressional districts in California will suffer confusion and loss (Feb. 9 is the start of the window for congressional candidates to file paperwork declaring their candidacies).
Why did this happen? Because the 6 “Republicans” on the U.S. Supreme Court have apparently decided to let individual states redraw congressional districts mid-term. They let Texas do it on Dec. 4, and now they’re “being consistent” to let California do it too.
Thus, the “chickens” on the nation’s high court have avoided applying to California’s Proposition 50 the “equal protection” or “due process” clauses of the 14th Amendment and the 15th Amendment’s prohibition of voting laws elevating “race” and “color” above others.
Hopefully, President Donald Trump is learning that he needs to nominate constitutional fighters, not politically-correct “conservatives,” like he did his first term. For there’s a big difference between Texas getting rid of racist maps and California promoting racism and breaking other laws in its Prop. 50 scheme.
SCOTUS’s cowardly deed means California Republicans will likely lose five congressional seats. And while some principled conservatives are happy to get rid of some RINOs, SaveCalifornia.com has consistently opposed Prop. 50 for its unfair gerrymandering.
As for the Republican majority in the U.S. House of Representatives, I think it will likely hold this year, since there are more Republican states doing redistricting than Democrat Party states. But since Congress has so many RINOS — Republicans In Name Only — who vote for the Swamp and with the Democrats — the bigger question is, will our Republic hold?
It’s going to be a wild and vitally important election year — and your active participation is definitely needed!
More on this story and issue:
SCOTUS Blog: “Supreme Court allows California to use congressional map benefitting Democrats”
California Globe: “Supreme Court rejects GOP bid to block California’s Prop 50 redistricting scheme”
Los Angeles Times: “Supreme Court, with no dissents, rejects GOP challenge to California’s new election map”
USA Today: “7 states tinker with congressional maps after California, Texas changes”
Contrary to House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries’ nutty claim that Republicans are trying to “steal the midterm elections” by redistricting in Texas, state legislators there are trying to correct what the Justice Department correctly calls “unconstitutional racially based” gerrymanders … Contrary to the discrimination claims they’re making in the press, it is these errant Democrats—not Republicans—who think there is nothing wrong with judging how people will vote based on the color of their skin and who want to preserve the racist redistricting. Election law expert Hans von Spakovsky in the Daily Signal, Aug. 6, 2025
Wednesday, January 14, 2026, 12:07 pm | Randy Thomasson
Um, a dude in a sports bra and make-up is NOT female.
Because there are only two sexes: If you’ve inherited a Y chromosome from your father, you’re male; if not, you’re female. The laws of Nature and Nature’s God cannot be altered.
FAST FACTS:
The SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States) hearing on Jan. 13 was on whether to strike down state laws in Idaho and West Virginia that prohibit biological males from invading women’s and girls’ school sports teams.
After nearly three-and-a-half hours of arguments, reasonable court observers predict the Republican states’ pro-family laws will not be deemed unconstitutional and will therefore survive.
In July 2025, the Trump Administration’s U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a California federal lawsuit alleging the State of California is violating Title IX by engaging “in illegal sex discrimination against female student athletes by allowing males to compete against them.”
Title IX is a U.S. federal civil rights law passed in 1972 that prohibits sex discrimination in any education program or activity receiving federal funding. When passed, it aimed to ensure equal opportunities for women and girls in educational settings.
In September 2025, three high school girls in Southern California, represented by Advocates for Faith & Freedom, filed a new federal lawsuit — in the same Central California federal court district that the DOJ filed its lawsuit — to protect the girls’ rights under Title IX and the U.S. Constitution.
The California cases challenging California’s AB 1266 could reach the nation’s high court as soon as 2027; however, they must first be heard in federal district court and federal appeals court.
AB 1266 (signed by Gov. Jerry Brown in 2013) requires all K-12 public schools to permit biological boys in girls’ restrooms, showers, clubs, and sports teams; and biological girls in boys’ restrooms, showers, clubs, and sports teams. The “right” to violate these sexual boundaries is solely a self-declaration of a different “gender identity.”
Bottom line, the right lawsuits challenging AB 1266 are in place, but the wait for a SCOTUS hearing could be one to two years from now.
In the meantime, for real protection of girls, there’s a sure way to safeguard your children and grandchildren from sexual indoctrination in the government schools. See our special website for parents, RescueYourChild.com.
“We have a sitting Supreme Court justice who won’t say what a woman is because they’re not a biologist, which is so silly, because you don’t have to be a biologist to know what a woman is. I’m not a vet, but I know what a dog is.” Riley Gaines, former college athlete and biological girls advocate, in 2023
Thursday, January 1, 2026, 10:37 pm | Randy Thomasson
As California’s governors and state legislators have gotten “progressively” worse, your domestic enemies (both Democrat Party politicians and RINOs) have invented new evil, as the Bible warns us they will do.
As of January 1, the awful bills that Gavin Newsom signed are now law. Democrat Party state legislators are three-fourths of both houses (the 40-member Senate and the 80-member Assembly) are Democrats. And too many Republicans, who should use their only power to expose evil, have become RINOs (Republicans In Name Only), who either vote in favor of Democrat bills or refuse to speak up to expose them.
Here are some of the worst, immoral, anti-family laws taking effect:
The outrageous new threat of AB 495 against impressionable children will primarily happen on government school campuses. Because parents aren’t there, and the 1-page form, which school staff must respect and obey, supersedes everything else. There is no proof of “relative” status required. For legal kidnapping to occur, all that’s needed is a compliant or confused child.
In the California statutes, “gender” already means subjective “gender identity” and “gender expression.” AB 932 takes this and prohibits “gender discrimination” in all government-run sports programs (public schools, cities, counties, etc.). Thus, the new law’s result is that biological males must be permitted to play on females’ teams and use females’ locker rooms, showers, and restrooms. And four “Republicans” joining nearly all the Democrats in voting “yes” on AB 932 shows that with Democrat Party and RINO politicians, girls lose.
This is the opposite of what parents want and children need. For youth suicide rates are significantly higher in states promoting transsexuality to kids and offering them “puberty blockers” and other “trans drugs.” And the Trevor Project on the back of student ID cards goes to a website where children can meet adult “sex” predators, all hidden from parents. AB 727 received the “yes” votes of nearly all the Democrat Party state legislators.
Even if you support so-called “assisted suicide,” what if it involves murder? SB 403’s continuation of California’s badly-written “assisted suicide” law doesn’t even guarantee the choice of the person. Even if there was evidence of a struggle, and even if an heir was present, police and paramedics and district attorneys are ordered to look the other way. Because under this dangerous law, no investigation or charge is allowed.
Abortion pills frequently injure women and girls — and always kill an innocent human being, the baby. Yet AB 260, intent on killing preborn babies, would require pharmacists to dispense them, permits teenagers to obtain abortion pills anonymously, fast-tracks it for welfare recipients, requires coverage by Medi-Cal and private insurance plans, and exempts pushers of abortion drugs from “civil, criminal, disciplinary, or other administrative action” — despite the resulting injuries.
Although sold as combating antisemitism, this deceptive bill (a product of the so-called “Diversity Caucus”) is based on Education Code, Section 220, which includes “gender, gender identity, gender expression … sexual orientation.” As such, AB 715 orders K-12 “public” schools to purge any scientific teaching about human physiology and the natural family that “would subject a pupil to unlawful discrimination” (i.e., whatever “offends” LGBTQIA+ activists). In the State Legislature, most Democrats and 28 of 30 Republicans voted “yes” for this.
Please tell others about these new horrible laws now in effect in California. And please take action to protect your family where you can (AB 495 and AB 715 are even more reasons to get your precious children and grandchildren out of the government schools).
RSS 2.0 Feed