| |
SaveCalifornia.com Blog//
Archives for the ‘Fighting for what’s right’ Category
Sunday, March 8, 2026, 7:21 am | Randy Thomasson
SaveCalifornia.com provides this solely for educational purposes and does not support or oppose candidates for public office.
Now that the March 6 filing deadline for California candidates has come and gone, have the chances increased or decreased to get a mostly-conservative Republican governor? With even imbalanced, liberal polls showing Republicans Chad Bianco and Steve Hilton in the “top two” (in California’s “jungle” primary election, only the top two vote-getters go on to the November runoff). And with the big egos of Democrats tempting them stay in the race (likely to get statewide recognition for their future campaigns), it’s looking more plausible that Republicans could “shut out” the Democrats by winning the “top two.”
Only Democrat Ian Calderon of East Los Angeles, not a statewide “name,” dropped out on Thursday, one day before the March 6 candidate filing deadline. And while he endorsed Eric Swalwell, I suspect Calderon’s racist Hispanic Democrat Party followers will prefer another Hispanic, either Antonio Villaraigosa or Xavier Becerra.
More Democrat Party leaders are worrying, and more Republican Party activists are noticing, that if California conservatives are energized to vote and propel Bianco and Hilton to “top two” positions in the June 2 “jungle” primary, that would “lock in” a mostly-conservative Republican governor in the November runoff, which would be truly historic.
Here’s our new hypothetical scenario of the governor’s race in California’s “jungle” primary. Based on the voter turnout in California’s 2024 presidential general election, SaveCalifornia.com gives 40% of the electorate to conservatives, including Republicans, and 60% of the vote to liberals, including Democrats:
21% Steve Hilton (R) 19% Chad Bianco (R) – – – – – 15% Eric Swalwell (D) 12% Katie Porter (D) 9% Tom Steyer (D) 5% Xavier Becerra (D) 5% Antonio Villaraigosa (D) 3% Betty Yee (D) 3% Tony Thurmond (D) 3% Matt Mahan (D) 5% other
So, if you’re conservative, now is not the time to debate whether Bianco or Hilton is better. For a mostly-Republican governor is only assured if both Republicans get enough support to be the top two vote-getters who go on to the November election, where only their names will be on ballot for governor, and then one of them will be elected governor.
Heavily Democratic California could elect a Republican governor for the first time in two decades as a result of its primary voting system, recent polling suggests. The Golden State has for over a decade mandated “top-two” primaries for state and congressional elections. Candidates in those races compete in the same primary, with the first- and second-place finishers, regardless of party affiliation, advancing to the general election. In California’s 2026 gubernatorial election, however, the presence of many Democrats with no clear frontrunner could possibly lead to the two well-known Republicans taking both spots on the general election ballot, Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco and former Fox News host Steve Hilton. Anthony Iafrate, Daily Caller News Foundation, Dec. 6, 2025
Posted in California Governor, Democrats, Election, Fighting for what's right, Good Government, Republicans, SaveCalifornia.com, Voters | Comments Off on UPDATE: Can a mostly-conservative Republican become the next governor?
Wednesday, February 4, 2026, 8:41 pm | Randy Thomasson
Why are Californians stuck with the unfair, racist Prop. 50?
The U.S. Supreme Court’s one-sentence denial of the Trump Administration’s emergency appeal petition on Feb. 4 means that Republican candidates for U.S. congressional districts in California will suffer confusion and loss (Feb. 9 is the start of the window for congressional candidates to file paperwork declaring their candidacies).
Why did this happen? Because the 6 “Republicans” on the U.S. Supreme Court have apparently decided to let individual states redraw congressional districts mid-term. They let Texas do it on Dec. 4, and now they’re “being consistent” to let California do it too.
Thus, the “chickens” on the nation’s high court have avoided applying to California’s Proposition 50 the “equal protection” or “due process” clauses of the 14th Amendment and the 15th Amendment’s prohibition of voting laws elevating “race” and “color” above others.
Hopefully, President Donald Trump is learning that he needs to nominate constitutional fighters, not politically-correct “conservatives,” like he did his first term. For there’s a big difference between Texas getting rid of racist maps and California promoting racism and breaking other laws in its Prop. 50 scheme.
SCOTUS’s cowardly deed means California Republicans will likely lose five congressional seats. And while some principled conservatives are happy to get rid of some RINOs, SaveCalifornia.com has consistently opposed Prop. 50 for its unfair gerrymandering.
As for the Republican majority in the U.S. House of Representatives, I think it will likely hold this year, since there are more Republican states doing redistricting than Democrat Party states. But since Congress has so many RINOS — Republicans In Name Only — who vote for the Swamp and with the Democrats — the bigger question is, will our Republic hold?
It’s going to be a wild and vitally important election year — and your active participation is definitely needed!
More on this story and issue:
SCOTUS Blog: “Supreme Court allows California to use congressional map benefitting Democrats”
California Globe: “Supreme Court rejects GOP bid to block California’s Prop 50 redistricting scheme”
Los Angeles Times: “Supreme Court, with no dissents, rejects GOP challenge to California’s new election map”
USA Today: “7 states tinker with congressional maps after California, Texas changes”
SaveCalifornia.com 2025: “Why the unfair, corrupt Prop. 50 passed”
Contrary to House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries’ nutty claim that Republicans are trying to “steal the midterm elections” by redistricting in Texas, state legislators there are trying to correct what the Justice Department correctly calls “unconstitutional racially based” gerrymanders … Contrary to the discrimination claims they’re making in the press, it is these errant Democrats—not Republicans—who think there is nothing wrong with judging how people will vote based on the color of their skin and who want to preserve the racist redistricting. Election law expert Hans von Spakovsky in the Daily Signal, Aug. 6, 2025
Posted in America, Ballot, California Governor, California Legislature, Congress, Constitution, Democrats, Donald Trump, Election, Fighting for what's right, Gavin Newsom, Judges, Racism, RINOs, SaveCalifornia.com, Trump, Voters | Comments Off on Why SCOTUS didn’t overturn Newsom & Co.’s unfair and racist Prop. 50
Wednesday, January 14, 2026, 12:07 pm | Randy Thomasson
Um, a dude in a sports bra and make-up is NOT female.
Because there are only two sexes: If you’ve inherited a Y chromosome from your father, you’re male; if not, you’re female. The laws of Nature and Nature’s God cannot be altered.
FAST FACTS:
- The SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States) hearing on Jan. 13 was on whether to strike down state laws in Idaho and West Virginia that prohibit biological males from invading women’s and girls’ school sports teams.
- After nearly three-and-a-half hours of arguments, reasonable court observers predict the Republican states’ pro-family laws will not be deemed unconstitutional and will therefore survive.
- In July 2025, the Trump Administration’s U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a California federal lawsuit alleging the State of California is violating Title IX by engaging “in illegal sex discrimination against female student athletes by allowing males to compete against them.”
- Title IX is a U.S. federal civil rights law passed in 1972 that prohibits sex discrimination in any education program or activity receiving federal funding. When passed, it aimed to ensure equal opportunities for women and girls in educational settings.
- In September 2025, three high school girls in Southern California, represented by Advocates for Faith & Freedom, filed a new federal lawsuit — in the same Central California federal court district that the DOJ filed its lawsuit — to protect the girls’ rights under Title IX and the U.S. Constitution.
- The California cases challenging California’s AB 1266 could reach the nation’s high court as soon as 2027; however, they must first be heard in federal district court and federal appeals court.
- AB 1266 (signed by Gov. Jerry Brown in 2013) requires all K-12 public schools to permit biological boys in girls’ restrooms, showers, clubs, and sports teams; and biological girls in boys’ restrooms, showers, clubs, and sports teams. The “right” to violate these sexual boundaries is solely a self-declaration of a different “gender identity.”
Bottom line, the right lawsuits challenging AB 1266 are in place, but the wait for a SCOTUS hearing could be one to two years from now.
In the meantime, for real protection of girls, there’s a sure way to safeguard your children and grandchildren from sexual indoctrination in the government schools. See our special website for parents, RescueYourChild.com.
“We have a sitting Supreme Court justice who won’t say what a woman is because they’re not a biologist, which is so silly, because you don’t have to be a biologist to know what a woman is. I’m not a vet, but I know what a dog is.” Riley Gaines, former college athlete and biological girls advocate, in 2023
Posted in America, California Bills, California Governor, California Legislation, Children, Congress, Constitution, Democrats, Education, Fighting for what's right, Future, Gavin Newsom, Good Science, Homeschooling, Judges, LGBT, Morality, Pam Bondi, Religious Freedom, Republicans, SaveCalifornia.com, Transsexuality, Trump | Comments Off on Will SCOTUS protect girls’ sports in California?
|
|
| |