Randy

SaveCalifornia.com Blog//

Archives for the ‘Constitution’ Category

Were there any moral victories in California?

Tuesday, November 19, 2024, 7:05 am | Randy Thomasson

SaveCalifornia.com provides this solely for educational purposes
and does not support or oppose candidates for public office.

Yes, there are victories to celebrate!

Of the eight bad propositions, there were four defeated: The foolish and harmful Prop. 5, Prop. 6, Prop. 32, and Prop. 33. These were stopped because majority of voters understood them (and weren’t led astray by establishment lies, as they were with Prop. 3 marriage anarchy).

The defeated bad propositions on the California ballot:

Prop. 5 would have permitted higher property taxes (attacking Prop. 13 from 1978) by lowering the “vote threshold from 66.67% to 55% for local special taxes and bond measures to fund housing projects and public infrastructure.” Targeted all property owners.More about Prop. 5

Prop. 6 would have called it “slavery” to make prisoners do work they don’t wish to do. This soft-on-crime proposition would have prohibited the Department of Corrections from disciplining (removing privileges from) convicts who refuse their work assignments. More about Prop. 6

Prop. 32 would have increased the “minimum wage” to $18/hr. for all California employees (killing even more jobs and businesses). More about Prop. 32

Prop. 33 would have permitted cities and counties to impose deceptive “rent control,” resulting in fewer rentals and higher rents, as frustrated landlords sell their rental houses and duplexes to become non-rental primary residences, and as developers lack investors to build new rentals. More about Prop. 33

And of course, Prop. 36’s decisive passage to empower county district attorneys to make retail theft a crime again was a great victory over Newsom & the Democrat-Party-run Legislature’s pro-criminal agenda.

What’s more, in Southern California and the San Francisco Bay Area, pro-criminal district attorneys were fired. George-Soros-funded, pro-criminal district attorneys George Gascón of Los Angeles County and Pamela Price of Alameda County were booted from office.

Pro-family pick-ups: In the California State Legislature, there STILL might be two moral, pro-family Republican pick-ups in the Assembly and one Republican pick-up in the State Senate:

Jeff Gonzalez is the Republican candidate for State Assembly District 36 in San Bernardino and Imperial counties. Gonzalez is a Bible-based Christian pastor, who’s likely to speak and fight for your moral-social-fiscal-conservative-constitutional values.

Leticia Castillo is a professing, Bible-believing Christian Republican candidate for State Assembly District 58 in western Riverside County, plus Grand Terrace in San Bernardino County. If elected, she is also likely to speak up for moral and family values.

Steven Choi, the Republican candidate for State Senate District 37 in Orange County (while in the State Assembly, Choi voted conservative most of the time, but was not known as much of a speaker or fighter).

Bad laws passed by the Democrat-Party-controlled California Legislature and signed by Democrat-Party governors mean the longest “counting” of ballots nationwide. It’s terrible that California’s counties don’t have to report their final counts until Dec. 6 and the California Secretary of State won’t certify the election until Dec. 13.

Let this long “counting” be a reminder to us all: If you want election integrity and investigations to expose it, always vote against Democrats and RINOs, who obstruct the “one person, one vote” American foundation of representative government.

What’s more, the next Attorney General of the United States needs to conduct a tough audit of the vote-counting practices of California and other Democrat-Party-controlled states.

Because the days of blanket trust are gone, and the burden is on vote counters to provide evidence of accuracy.

You have to ask why the Democrat Party politicians and their slavish bureaucrats (big-county registrars of voters) are so opposed to voter ID with photo, so giddy about littering the state with vote-by-mail ballots, so addicted to computer-based voting, and permitting a WHOLE MONTH of “counting,” “processing,” “curing,” and more?

As SaveCalifornia.com posted on our social media on Nov. 18:

Track California returns for U.S. congressional seats

Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil;
Who put darkness for light, and light for darkness;
Who put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
The Bible, Isaiah 5:20

Terrible — Prop. 3 marriage anarchy passes in California

Thursday, November 7, 2024, 7:31 am | Randy Thomasson
Sadly, the sexual anarchy dressed up as “marriage equality” has passed in California, where too many voters are dumbed down and loathe to do critical thinking or their own research.

California’s corrupt, immoral Democrat Party officials made Prop. 3 easy to pass.

Instead of telling voters the facts — that Prop. 3 opens the door to legalize unrestricted child marriages, incestuous marriages, polygamy, bigamy, even “marriages” with animals and objects — the Democrat Party’s Attorney General, Secretary of State, and Legislative Analyst this summer conspired to write in the “Official Voter Information Guide” that Prop. 3 only “updates the Constitution to match what the federal courts have said about who can marry” and “there would be no change in who can marry.” Lies, lies, and more lies.

What’s next: Starting as soon as 2025, expect California state lawsuits using Prop. 3 to legalize marriages with whomever and whatever. Fear for the boys and girls who’ll be roped into unrestricted child marriages (parental permission no longer required), and feel for the young women deceived into polygamous marriages with multiple spouses. What’s more, perverse organizations in other Democrat-Party-controlled states will want to replicate marriage anarchy there too.

Thank you for standing with SaveCalifornia.com as we fought hard to inform reasonable Californians about how Prop. 3 collided with their values.

For the love of God and people, we informed as many Californians as we could about Prop. 3’s legal subjectivity, and urged them to send their friends to LearnAboutProp3.com.

If our side had $5 to $10 million to spend, the outcome could have been different. But evil has prevailed. Their scheme was set, the deception done, the lies led, fools fell for it, and human beings will indeed be harmed.

Other Facts:

In 2023, 88 Democrats + 10 RINOs placed ACA 5 on the ballot to become Prop. 3 (the 10 Republicans were Juan Alanis, Phillip Chen, Laurie Davies, Diane Dixon, Bill Essayli, Josh Hoover, Devon Mathis, Marie Waldron, Greg Wallis, and Scott Wilk)

Wealthy homosexual activists spent at least $1.43 million on lie-based ads to expand the reach of their Democrat Party official’s false ballot descriptions

California clergy did not organize and rise up against Prop. 3 like they did in 2008 to protect man-woman marriage licenses with Prop. 8

“Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in Me to sin, it would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck, and he were drowned in the depth of the sea.”
Jesus Christ, Savior of the world and God in the flesh, in Matthew 18:6

How to increase the security of your ballot in California

Tuesday, October 22, 2024, 6:12 pm | Randy Thomasson

Because election fraud is real, I urge you to vote early, in person, and with a paper ballot.

Stop and realize the overall benefit is having the least number of strangers’ hands on your ballot.

As we know, nationwide, “discrepancies” have occurred with “election-day ballots” and “ballots counted after election day” (ballots in envelopes) and wherever computerized machines do the counting (and adding and subtracting).

Yes, because of human sin and domestic enemies (New Communist Democrats), there’s a real problem with election integrity, not just in California, but nationwide.

So it behooves you to avoid computers, avoid election-day voting, and avoid submitting your ballot in an envelope. This gives your ballot its best chance to count — unmolested.

To help honest voters on the “Left Coast,” Election Integrity Project, California is recommending, based on a new law in effect here in 2024, for “voters to cast their marked vote by mail ballot at the polls without the security envelope.”

Again, this method means having the least number of strangers’ hands on your ballot, avoiding manipulatable computers, and avoiding the election fraud done on election-day ballots and ballots in sealed envelopes opened after the polls close on election day.

Californians’ ability to vote this way is based on AB 626, which went into effect this year, reading: “A voter may vote their vote by mail ballot, without the identification envelope, in person at the polling place designated for the voter’s home precinct or at a vote center.”

However, this option might not be available in all of California’s 58 counties. Because AB 626 is conditional on the county elections office being set up to handle it.

What we know is that the 29 California counties participating in the Voter’s Choice Act of 2016 — a pre-Covid tyranny bill that exchanged neighborhood polling places for several “vote centers” in a county, where you can vote in person — have already agreed per the Act’s provisions to accept voters casting their already-marked vote-by-mail ballots, in person, without the “security envelope.”

As EIP California explains, “Voter’s Choice Act and Electronic Poll Book counties … must now allow voters to cast their marked vote by mail ballot at the polls without the security envelope.”

The 29 California counties participating in the Voter’s Choice Act (VCA), which includes several physical voting centers and letting voters cast paper ballots, are Alameda, Amador, Butte, Calaveras, El Dorado, Fresno, Humboldt, Kings, Los Angeles, Madera, Marin, Mariposa, Merced, Napa, Nevada, Orange, Placer, Riverside, Sacramento, San Benito, San Diego, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, Sonoma, Stanislaus, Tuolumne, Ventura, Yolo.

We don’t know how many counties, in addition to this, are Electronic Poll Book counties that will also accept marked vote-by-mail ballots without the envelope. Your best bet is to call your own county elections office, and tell them you want to vote in person using a paper ballot and how to do it.

Where election fraud and New Communist Democrat thievery exist, you must do what you can to secure your ballot. Yes, liberals like fraud-inviting mail-in ballots. Yet you can be glad you can now cast your marked vote-by-mail ballot in person without the envelope.


Regarding Step 4 (above), some election integrity activists refuse to use a Ballot Marking Device (BMD) and also report not all vote centers have paper ballot scanners. They say instead of using a BMD (which, nowadays, is mostly for people with disabilities), they’ll leave for another vote center that will serve them.

Your best bet in your county is to go to your election headquarters to vote in person — and early — and by casting your already-marked vote-by-mail ballot as your paper ballot, you’ll create a “verified paper record” and avoid your ballot being “trucked” from one place to another, thus making it harder for domestic enemies to manipulate your ballot.

Please don’t regard this as too complex. Because when election fraud is real and you want your vote to count, it’s going to take a little more effort. Join me in being glad 2024 has ushered in a new law, where half or more of California’s counties will let you cast the most secure ballot you can.

Get help filling out your ballot with a good conscience — visit (and invite your friends to visit) the SaveCalifornia.com Pro-Family Election Center.

Dishonest scales are an abomination to the LORD,
But a just weight is His delight.

The Bible, Proverbs 11:1