Randy

SaveCalifornia.com Blog//

Archives for the ‘California Constitution’ Category

Will Prop. 8 be overturned by California voters?

Tuesday, March 30, 2010, 5:21 pm |

There’s a new, large poll out on homosexual “marriages” from the Public Policy Institute of California.

It’s got some things that pro-family citizens won’t like. But keep reading, because it’s a shot in the arm that should get you talking to others about the natural and beautiful institution of marriage between a man and a woman, the very foundation of family.

The March 9-16 PPIC poll found that support for homosexual “marriage” legalization is edging up in California. Among all adults, more say they favor (50%) same-sex “marriage” than oppose it (45%). This is a five percent increase from similar polls between 2004 and 2009, when support for the notion of homosexual “marriages” hovered around 45%.

Sadly, majorities of Democrats (64%) and independents (55%) support destroying the natural definition of marriage. However, most Republicans (67%) oppose redefining marriage. Most whites (55%) express support for homosexual “marriages,” while Latinos are more opposed (51%) than in favor (43%) of altering the foundation of familia.

How accurate is the poll? Telephone polls are less accurate than they used to be, because a lot of conservatives won’t talk to pollsters who ring their home or cell phone.

Ultimately, the only poll that matters is on Election Day. The PPIC poll claims that likely voters supported homosexual “marriage” legalization 49% to 45%. But that’s not very reliable since the poll identified “likely voters” based on what people said about themselves, not on their actual voter records.

WHAT SAVECALIFORNIA.COM IS SAYING

I had the privilege of telling the truth about this issue to millions of Latinos that read La Opinion, California’s largest Spanish-language newspaper.

From the March 30 newspaper article, entitled “Gays seek Latino support”:

Randy Thomasson of the organization SaveCalifornia.com said the PPIC survey had spoken with people who are not necessarily voters.

“This poll is a wake-up call to start talking about the importance of nature, morality, marital oneness, and children. Caring about the most important things in life means supporting marriage for only a man and a woman.”

The Republican gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman does not support gay marriage but civil unions and same-sex couples to adopt children.

Steve Poizner, Republican candidate for governor is also in favor of civil unions but not gay marriage. As the only Democratic candidate for governor Jerry Brown is sympathetic to the marriage of same-sex couples, calling it a fundamental right.

HOW TO RESPOND

Don’t be complacent. Let this horse-race poll be your wake-up call that marriage licenses are up for grabs. If you don’t know it yet, hear it now: Homosexual activists want to qualify a constitutional amendment to override Prop. 8 in 2012 or 2014. This would be a war for marriage licenses all over again.

So take action today. Talk to children and young adults and, as appropriate, sensitize them to the importance of protecting the natural institution of man-woman marriage. Tell them the facts:

• CHILDREN: An extensive body of research proves that children do best with a married father and mother. Yet children raised in homosexual environments experiment homosexually themselves and develop gender identity problems.

• LONGEVITY: Marriage between a man and a woman lasts, on average, 10 times longer than homosexual relationships.

• HEALTH: Monogamous sex between a faithfully married husband and wife is the only true “safe sex” around, while homosexual “sex” is inherently unhealthy.

• BIOLOGY: It’s a lie to promote same-sex “marriages” because men and women are biologically created for each other, not men for men or women for women.

• SPIRITUAL TRUTH: In the Bible, God consistently says that marriage is only for a man and a woman. To disagree with this exclusive, sacred definition is to go against God Himself.

“No people will tamely surrender their Liberties, nor can any be easily subdued, when knowledge is diffused and Virtue is preserved. On the Contrary, when People are universally ignorant, and debauched in their Manners, they will sink under their own weight without the Aid of foreign Invaders.”
U.S. Founding Father Samuel Adams, 1775

Illegal immigration funding, policies under the microscope

Friday, July 10, 2009, 12:52 pm |

“You don’t ever want a crisis to go to waste.  It’s an opportunity to do important things that you would otherwise avoid.” — Rahm Emanuel, Barack Obama’s White House Chief of Staff

In the midst of its burgeoning $26.3 BILLION budget deficit, Democrats and Republicans agree it’s a crisis but disagree on the solution.

Disagreement is good because it means there is hope to cut waste and fraud. Disagreement is also good because it informs the voters who wants to tax and fee them and who doesn’t.

Democrat leaders said California would “go off the cliff” if there wasn’t a budget deal by June 30. But the Republicans wouldn’t cave to the Democrats’ demands for higher taxes, fees, and borrowing. So the majority Democrats now admit California state government won’t run out of money until late August.

This temporary gridlock means slightly better government may be around the corner. Because no spending plan can pass without Republican votes, the need to cut tens of BILLIONS of dollars in waste is a historic opportunity for Republican lawmakers to reform government. That is, if they hold firm and refuse to cave.

The largest areas of waste in state government are obviously the biggest: health and human services (one-third of the state budget), public education (40% of the state budget), and state prisons (more than 10% of the state budget).

Intertwined in all these areas is the high cost of illegal immigration. Those who ignore U.S. sovereignty and border laws are costing California government more than $10 BILLION each year.  The drain is felt in the government school system, the state welfare system, the unemployment insurance fund, jails and prisons, and much more under Health and Human Services.

Schwarzenegger is proposing limiting welfare and nonemergency healthcare for illegal aliens and their families. But, as  expected, the pro-illegal immigration Democratic majority in the California Legislature has rejected his plans.

According the Los Angeles Times, “One of the governor’s proposals would place a five-year limit on state welfare payments to the U.S.-citizen children of illegal immigrants. That would affect approximately 100,000 U.S.-born children in about 48,000 California households headed by illegal immigrants, who receive a monthly average of $472. The measure could save $77 million annually, according to the governor’s office.

Under another proposal, the governor could commute the sentences of some illegal immigrant felons in state prisons and shift them to federal detention centers. It costs the state $48,000 to incarcerate a prisoner, and the federal government reimburses about 12 cents on the dollar, according to state finance officials. The administration estimates that commuting sentences of 8,500 felons, along with other sentencing changes, could save $182 million, although other state analysts question that.

Meanwhile, there are two citizen-led initiative efforts underway to address the illegal immigration problem:

Gathering signatures right now is the California Taxpayer Protection Act, which would roll back much of California’s government subsidization of illegal immigrants. The effort is being led by former state Senator Bill Morrow and former U.S. Attorney Peter Nunez.

The initiative would end 18 years of welfare payments to illegal aliens with U.S. born children; require all those who are not citizens or permanent legal residents to submit ID documents, provided to Homeland Security, before receiving a birth certificate; allow only citizens and permanent legal residents eligibility for all public benefits including non-emergency and pre-natal care; and allows Homeland Security to review approved applications for federal, state or local benefits that illegal aliens are permitted to receive due to a U.S. born child.

Another proposed ballot measure gathering signatures right now targets illegal voting, whether it’s committed by citizens or non-citizens.

The VoteSafeNow campaign is led by state Senator George Runner. According to VoteSafeNow, the initiative would “protect the integrity of all votes by verifying voters’ identity,” “ensure our brave military men and women have their votes counted,” and “require election officials to verify absentee ballot voters’ signatures and identification.”

Democrat politicians vote to tax and fee you more

Monday, June 29, 2009, 2:03 pm |

It only took five-and-a-half weeks after they were spanked by California voters for the tax-and-spend politicians to rebel against their masters.

Despite the vote of Californians on May 19 to reject higher taxes and fees and more borrowing, the Democrats in the California Legislature — both yesterday and today — have voted to impose higher taxes and fees and borrowing. I know it sounds crazy, but it’s true.

The good news is that all six Republicans who voted for higher taxes and fees in February are now OPPOSING the new taxes and fees of the Democrats, in both the Assembly and the Senate. The spanking from the voters seems to at least be working on Republican legislators.

Even better news is that Governor Schwarzenegger will veto this tax-and-fee package because it’s unconstitutional. It takes a two-thirds vote of each house to increase revenue, which won’t happen without Republican votes.  

The Democrats don’t know their constitution and claim they can raise taxes and fees by a simple majority.  In December, the Governor vetoed a similar package of bills that violated the constitutional two-thirds requirement.

The truth is, the Democrats’ irresponsible tax-and-spend habits of the last 20+ years have put the State of California into a kind of financial foreclosure.

But the ruling Democrat politicians don’t want to cut the waste and fraud that’s plain to see. Instead, they want you to pay the bill anda bail them out. (Note: If you have your identity in a political party, rest assured that I’m a registered independent who simply calls ’em as I see ’em.)

Instead of raising taxes and fees, the Democrats should get honest and slash tens of billions of dollars annually in government waste and fraud. This is the first necessary step in restoring financial health to California government.

Today, SaveCalifornia.com issued a truth-telling news release condemning the Democrats’ attack upon the finances of California families. Read it here.

This whole battle of tax increases versus cutting government waste may be resolved this week. If it’s not, IOUs will be issued to government contractors starting July 1. They’ll eventually be paid when a budget deal is struck.

California’s tax-and-spend government must cut the bloat. That’s what the voters demanded on Election Day and what hard-working families are demanding now.

The winners of this battle will be those who persevere the longest. Will you do your part in this fast-moving battle? Please click here to take immediate action. Urge Governor Schwarzenegger and your legislators to “Oppose higher taxes and fees and more borrowing. Cut massive waste and fraud instead!”

As a dog returns to its vomit, 
so a fool repeats his folly.
Proverbs 26:11 NIV