If you think Democrat politicians’ anti-family bills are bad, what about “Republicans” who vote for them?
This is a growing problem in Sacramento. But instead of prostituting themselves to the unnatural, unhealthy, tyrannical “LGBTQIA+” agenda targeting children, they should be speaking against these horrible bills to expose them!
Here are your RINOs, who are betraying conservative voters:
David Tangipa(916-319-2008, 559-446-2029) of California’s Gold Country: Voted YES on AB 932 to prohibit “gender [“identity/expression”] discrimination” in city/county sports programs and facilities; voted YES on AB 1084 to fast-track legal changes to minors’ “genders” and weaken parents’ ability to object; voted YES on AB 86 to require anti-family, immoral “sexual health education materials”; also on May 19, he COAUTHORED HR 34 to honor sexual anarchist Harvey Milk of San Francisco.
Diane Dixon(916-319-2072, 949-798-7221) of Orange County’s beach cities: Voted YES on AB 932 to prohibit “gender [“identity/expression”] discrimination” in city/county sports programs and facilities; voted YES on AB 86 to require anti-family, immoral “sexual health education materials.”
About these bad bills:
AB 932 prohibits “gender” discrimination in city and county sports programs. In the California statutes, “gender” means subjective “gender identity” and “gender expression.” As such, this bill would promote transsexuality over people’s consciences, invade girls’ sports in particular, and open the door to lawsuits against dissenters. This bill requires public schools and city/county/special district sports organizations and facilities to permit biological males on females’ teams and to use females’ locker rooms and restrooms, and vice versa — or risk a private party lawsuit that aims to penalizes with financial damages.
AB 86 is all based on the anti-family 2019 curriculum frameworks approved by the State Board of Education requiring children in K-12 state schools to be positively taught to accept masturbation, oral sex, teen fornication, homosexuality, bisexuality, transsexuality, abortion, and more.
And which Republicans joined the Democrats on May 19 and voted YES on HR 34 to honor the dishonorable founder of “LGBTQIA+” activism in California, Harvey Milk of San Francisco?
Keep scrolling for their names and contact info so YOU can tell them what you think!
Milk was a sexual predator of teens, who believed and pushed sexual anarchy (no boundaries), who denied the reality of STDs, and who publicly told sexual lies that generations later are greatly harming children. See the documentation.
Authored by homosexual activist Democrat Party legislators, the pro-“LGBTQ+” Harvey Milk resolution read, in part:
“WHEREAS, Harvey Milk’s life and social contributions have left an indelible mark on the history of our nation and hold a special meaning for the people of California; now, therefore, be it Resolved by the Assembly of the State of California, That the Assembly recognizes the pioneering contributions of Harvey Milk to the cause of LGBTQ+ civil rights and commemorates May 22, 2025, as Harvey Milk Day.”
8 Assembly “Republicans” added themselves as HR 34 coauthors:
Phillip Chen of Brea, Yorba Linda, Placentia, Villa Park, Orange, North Tustin, Anaheim Hills, Chino, and Chino Hills (916-319-2059, 714-529-5502)
Laurie Davies of south Orange County, including Laguna Niguel, Dana Point, San Juan Capistrano, and San Clemente (916-319-2074, 760-433-7400, 949-240-7300)
Carl DeMaio of east San Diego County; Josh Hoover of northeast Sacramento County (916-319-2075, 858-566-7538)
Josh Hoover of northeast Sacramento County, including Citrus Heights, Folsom, and Rancho Cordova, Carmichael, Fair Oaks, Foothill Farms, Gold River, Mather, McClellan Park, North Highlands, Orangevale, and Rosemont. (916-319-2007, 916-294-9774)
Tom Lackey of western Palmdale and Lancaster, Mojave, California City, Barstow, Victorville, Apple Valley, Lucerne Valley, Crestline, Lake Arrowhead, Big Bear City, Fort Irwin, and Twentynine Palms (916-319-2034, 661-267-7636, 760-539-1341)
Tri Ta of Westminster, Garden Grove, Cerritos, Los Alamitos, and Fountain Valley (916-319-2070, 714-379-0970)
David Tangipa of Calaveras, Inyo, Mariposa, Mono, Tuolumne counties, and the eastern parts of Fresno and Madera counties (916-319-2008, 559-446-2029)
Greg Wallis of eastern Riverside County, including Mentone, Yucaipa, Beaumont, Banning, Idyllwild, Morongo Valley, Desert Hot Springs, Palm Springs, Cathedral City, Thousand Palms, Rancho Mirage, Palm Desert, and La Quinta (916-319-2047, 760-346-6342)
1 Senate “Republican” voted to honor Harvey Milk and his “LGBTQIA+” agenda via SR 38:
Suzette Valladares of Santa Clarita, Lancaster, Palmdale, Pinon Hills, Wrightwood, Victorville, and Hesperia (916-651-4023, 661-286-1471, 661-729-6232)
PLEASE TAKE QUICK ACTION:
Leave an after-hours, confidential voicemail (or if one of these RINOs represents you, your name and community), saying how disappointed you are with them voting for (name the bill and resolution numbers and what they would do).
Hold these RINOs (Republicans In Name Only) accountable now!
Lying lips are an abomination to the LORD, But those who deal truthfully are His delight. Proverbs 12:22
He who works deceit shall not dwell within my house; He who tells lies shall not continue in my presence. Psalm 101:7
5/8/25 UPDATE: With huge public outrage over Democrat legislators OPPOSING increased penalties for sex solicitors of 16- and 17-year-old prostitutes, their Assembly Speaker announced the felony charge for these “johns” would go back in AB 379 – as long as perps “within three years of the age of the minor” are EXCLUDED. And when AB 379 was amended on May 8, ONLY “a second or subsequent violation” is “punishable as a felony.” This is the half-baked scheming of the supermajority Democrat Party state legislators!
Our May 2 post:
Tell others Democrat politicians think it’s OK for children to be “sold for sex.” Because they’ve killed a bill to protect wayward teens!
The “sex worker” and “LGBTQIA+” lobby is controlling the Democrats! So they’re blocking a bill to crack down on soliciting 16- and 17-year-old prostitutes for sexual encounters.
Except for molestation and rape, they see all sex as “consensual,” no matter one’s age. Yes, too many of today’s Democrat Party politicians believe the lie that children can “consent” to sex. This is their sickening, ultimate goal.
Yet as more reasonable Californians wake up to this travesty, they’ll oppose the anti-children Democrats. As CalMatters noted, “California Republicans are increasingly pushing Democrats on child sex crimes bills. The supermajority is growing more divided about it.”
AB 379 would have done the following (before the Assembly Public Safety Committee’s hostile amendments functionally killed this bill on April 28):
16- and 17-year-old prostitutes would have been offered a diversion program upon the 1st or 2nd violation; otherwise, it’s would have been a misdemeanor.
Sex solicitors (“johns”) would have suffered tougher punishment:
a. Misdemeanor for loitering with the intent to “purchase commercial sex”
b. Felony for purchasing “sexual services” from anyone under the age of 18
c. Upon conviction, also fined $1,000 to go into a fund “to provide grants to community-based organizations that provide direct services and outreach to victims of sex trafficking and exploitation”
MORE FACTS:
This is truly a crossover issue, as demonstrated by AB 379’s lead author being an ardent baby-killer, who still has compassion on teen prostitutes. Democrat Party Assemblywoman Maggy Krell’s bio proudly states she was Planned Parenthood’s attorney fighting “the Trump White House’s assault on reproductive freedom.”
Despite Newsom saying on April 29 that “the law should treat all sex predators who solicit minors the same — as a felony, regardless of the intended victim’s age,” this is similar to what he did last year on this same issue. Yet he wouldn’t pretend to “care” if he weren’t planning to run for president in 2028. Proof: He could have gotten a legislator to author the same bill for him earlier this year, but he didn’t.
Deliver those who are drawn toward death, And hold back those stumbling to the slaughter. If you say, “Surely we did not know this,” Does not He who weighs the hearts consider it? He who keeps your soul, does He not know it? And will He not render to each man according to his deeds? The Bible, Proverbs 24:11-12
Tuesday, April 29, 2025, 8:43 pm | Randy Thomasson
SaveCalifornia.com provides this solely for educational purposes and does not support or oppose candidates for public office.
In light of California’s “jungle primary,” is splitting the votes of conservatives good or bad, and what are the chances of a mostly-conservative Republican being on the November 2026 ballot or being elected governor?
To answer, mostly-conservative Republican Steve Hilton’s entrance into the 2026 California governor’s race has immediately split the conservative vote between him and mostly-conservative Republican Chad Bianco.
If Hilton had not declared his candidacy, Bianco would have been virtually assured of being the highest or second-highest vote-getter in the primary.
Still, in the hypothetical scenarios I’ve been crunching, it’s plausible that a Republican could be one of “the top two” in the primary election, and if Kamala Harris doesn’t jump in, there’s even a path for either Bianco and Hilton to become governor.
Here are the “bigger” declared candidates, so far, in alphabetical order who want to replace Democrat Governor Gavin Newsom, who’s termed out:
Democrats: Toni Atkins, former State Senate leader, former State Assembly leader Xavier Becerra, former U.S. congressman, former State Attorney General, and former U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Eleni Kounalakis, current Lieutenant Governor Katie Porter, former U.S. congresswoman Tony Thurmond, former state assemblyman and current State Superintendent of Public Instruction Antonio Villaraigosa, former state assemblyman, former mayor of Los Angeles Betty Yee, current State Controller
Republicans: Chad Bianco, current sheriff of Riverside County Steve Hilton, media voice, former tech start-up founder, former U.K. government advisor
SCENARIO 1: Two Democrats win “the top two” slots of the June 2026 primary election (two really work hard at the expense of the other Dems), so both Democrats advance to the November election, and a Democrat will again become governor:
SCENARIO 3: 1 Democrat + 1 Republican win “the top two.” Here, the biggest Democrat, Kamala Harris, enters the race and “sucks all the oxygen out” of the other Democrats.
If Harris enters the race, expect up to 5 Democrats to drop out (Atkins, Kounalakis, Porter, Thurmond, and Yee). Also expect Harris to be puffed and promoted by California’s New Communist machinery. This scenario means a Republican will be on the November ballot.
SCENARIO 4: Two Republicanswin “the top two” (if Big Democrat Kamala Harris doesn’t jump in, Democrats might simply split into 7 portions that are smaller than the 2 Republican portions), meaning there will be a Republican governor:
I’ve provided these 4 scenarios to give you hope. In 3 of the 4, a Republican (either Bianco or Hilton, both mostly-conservatives) advances to the general election. Let this energize you to support the candidate who best represents your values!
“Moreover you shall select from all the people able men, such as fear God, men of truth, hating covetousness; and place such over them to be rulers of thousands, rulers of hundreds, rulers of fifties, and rulers of tens.” Advice of Moses’ father-in-law Jethro in Exodus 18:21
RSS 2.0 Feed