Randy

SaveCalifornia.com Blog//

Archives for the ‘Homosexuality’ Category

What in the world are public schools teaching these days?

Wednesday, November 18, 2009, 2:54 pm |

Shh…there’s an elephant in the living room.

Many parents are in denial of the very bad things happening to children’s hearts, minds, bodies and souls in public schools. They mistakenly think the schools are similar to when they were young. But the truth is, government schools have become much worse and are ruining children.

Our job is to love kids enough that we expose the darkness and challenge parents to rescue their own.

Here are the facts. Because of recent bad laws and politically-correct trends, here is what children in California public schools are guaranteed to receive before they graduate:

1. Homosexual-bisexual-transsexual education

2. Pro-abortion education, “confidential” abortion referrals and off-campus “counseling” without parental consent

3. Condom/birth control pills education and distribution without parental consent; no teaching children how to truly avoid STDs; “abstinence-only” education prohibited

4. Anti-God, pro-evolution education

5. Political correctness

6. Dumbed-down academics, less academic success, on average, than private or home schools

7. Negative socialization and peer pressure

8. Less safety, on average, than private schools

9. Anti-Christian education and widespread rejection of religious and moral values

10. Anti-parent sentiments

That’s the bad news. The good news is parents don’t have to subject their children to this brainwashing. SaveCalifornia.com is here to help.  Get the answers and action steps you need at our all-new, special-project website, RescueYourChild.com.

RescueYourChild.com  is “Ground Central Station” to equip parents to rescue their children from immoral, dumbed-down schools. Please, if you love children, spread the word to others about RescueYourChild.com.

Pro-family wins, losses and my perspective

Wednesday, November 4, 2009, 6:47 pm |

I’m very glad that two pro-life, pro-marriage governors have been elected. Here’s where Governor-Elects Bob McDonnell and Chris Christie stand on the issues:

Virginia Governor’s Election Results » Republican Bob McDonnell wins with 59%
> In victory speech, says “I thank God for His grace and His divine providence in my life.”
> Consistently pro-life on abortion, has championed man-woman marriage

New Jersey Governor’s Election Results » Republican Chris Christie wins with 49%
> Against same-sex “marriages,” supports existing pseudo-marriage “civil unions” law
> Favors the right to life for unborn babies

The two pro-family losses for Congress were the special elections in California and New York State where David Harmer and Doug Hoffman fell short.

In California’s low turnout special congressional election, the Republican Party should have poured in some big money (it has a lot) to elect Harmer instead of allowing the very liberal Democrat, John Garamendi, to capture the seat.

But the RNC didn’t have vision, so they didn’t put in much money. Still, pro-life, pro-marriage Harmer  persevered commendably and came within 10 points of Garamendi in the 10th district, where Democrat voter registration is 18 points higher than Republicans.  What is Garamendi’s anti-family agenda that you can expect  him to implement? Read it for yourself.

In upstate New York, the Obama-Pelosi Democrat machine played much harder to elect Democrat Bill Owens to Congress ahead of pro-family conservative Doug Hoffman. You saw the split between conservative and liberal Republicans and the RNC, instead of being conservative and supporting Hoffman, got involved too little too late. Hoffman has issued an “I’ll be back” statement. I bet he could win if he runs again.

As for the marriage license battle in Maine and the marriage-rights shoot-out in Washington State, it’s a great victory to pass Question 1 to “veto” the homosexual-marriage scheme of Main’s Governor and Legislature.

That said, at what cost did the Maine victory come? The “Yes” side actually ran ads promoting homosexual relationships, which principled pro-family leaders Matt Barber and Pete LaBarbera are exposing and decrying.

A marriage battle pro-family citizens didn’t hear much about was R-71 in Washington State. After the Democrat governor and the Democrat-controlled legislature passed a bill awarding all the rights of marriage to homosexual couples, principled pro-family leaders gathered enough signatures to force it to a vote of the people.

Yet national groups contributed too little too late to the Washington state campaign to protect man-woman marriage rights, which is trailing after being outspent four to one.

 An important lesson to learn from the Maine and Washington State contests is that moral values will only win when “might” (our part) is attached to “right” (God’s part). Another important lesson is, when you write marriage amendments, you’ve got to protect marriage rights as well as marriage licenses, because you can’t go back and “fix this” after marriage has been counterfeited.

Read the SaveAmerica.com news release: “Lessons conservatives must learn from marriage battles in Maine and Washington State.”

Keep track of the ongoing vote-by-mail counting in Washington State. The pro-family position is “No on R-71,” and the counting is not done yet finished in this close vote.

Obama’s hate attack against moral values and religious freedom

Thursday, October 29, 2009, 4:22 pm |

Our SaveCalifornia.com people are pretty astute. After receiving our Oct. 28 news release exposing how Barack Obama is attacking religious freedom with his signature on the federal ‘LGBT hate crimes’ bill, Mark wrote in, saying:

The whole concept of “hate crimes” is a crock.  Murder is murder.  Arson is arson.  Robbery is robbery.  Assault is assault.  It does not matter if the perpetrator or victim is white, black, hispanic, asian, Jewish, Mormon, Muslim, Shintao, homosexual, heterosexual, polymorphous perverse or whatever.  How politicians can presume to impose different penalties or more or less aggressive prosecution based on these factors is ludicrous.

Mark’s remarks make total sense when you look at today’s shooting at a North Hollywood synagogue. The media, the cops, and L.A. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa spent half the day wondering if this was a “hate crime.” Now they’re admitting it may have been a “random act of violence.”

What ever happened to crimes being crimes because of what perpetrators DID instead of what perpetrators THOUGHT? If someone vandalizes a house because he hates houses that are painted yellow, why should he be punished any less than if he vandalized because he hates the homeowner’s religious faith? Are the perpetrators thoughts illegal? No. But his actions certainly are!

Beyond the lunacy and thought-police of “hate crimes,” another significant problem is how lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender inclusion in ‘hate crimes’ laws lay the foundation to legally promote and enforce these lifestyles above anyone else’s rights. 

That’s what’s happened in California over the last decade. Today, homosexual-bisexual-transsexual “rights” are more legally powerful than religious rights, parental rights, and ownership rights.

President Obama, by signing the ‘LGBT hate crimes” bill into law, is showing his disdain for moral values and religious freedom. Actually, that’s too soft. Obama is attacking religious freedom by punishing religious values that object to homosexuality, bisexuality, and transsexuality.

Don’t believe it or want to learn more? We prove it point by point in our news release:

“Mr. President, here’s how ‘hate crime’ laws trample religious freedom.”