Randy

SaveCalifornia.com Blog//

Archives for the ‘republic’ Category

ALERT: Don’t want your free speech banned on social media? Act now!

Monday, September 29, 2025, 9:23 am | Randy Thomasson

It’s one of the worst attacks on constitutional free speech we’ve ever seen.

Please add your voice to others demanding a veto of the awful SB 771, which would blatantly ban conservative speech on social media platforms. Put the spotlight on presidential wannabe Gavin Newsom!

Newsom now says he’s against censorship, so urge him to veto SB 771 today!

1. Web form: Go to https://www.gov.ca.gov/contact, then select “Legislation Issues/Concerns,” then “Leave a Comment,” then select “Con,” then type a subject such as “Veto SB 771”, then type or paste in your message, then enter your contact information, then click “submit.”

2. Phone: Call (916) 445-2841 Monday-Friday 9am-5pm: Tell Newsom’s office you’re calling to urge Governor Newsom to “VETO SB 771. This is blatant, unconstitutional censorship.”

The text of SB 771 lists the kind of speech it would censor:

“anti-immigrant slurs”

“anti-LGBTQ+ disinformation and harmful rhetoric”

“anti-Islamic bias”

“coercive harassment”

“hate-motivated harm”

In other words, anything and everything the New Communist Democrats don’t want to see or hear, or whatever they don’t want the general public to know.

From the Daily Caller 9/24/25:

“If people think platforms remove their content too much now, they should expect to see the pattern significantly intensify with this law,” Shoshana Weissmann, director of digital media at the R Street Institute, told the Daily Caller News Foundation. “Rather than risk liability for showing users content one could argue (even if it doesn’t actually) violate a law, platforms will over-moderate and remove posts in order to stay out of court.”

Weissman added that platforms may also find it challenging to differentiate sarcasm, serious posts and sincere discussions about sensitive subjects, adding that over-removing content will be the only way they will be able to avoid liability.

Whoever would overthrow the Liberty of a Nation, must begin by subduing the Freeness of Speech.
U.S. founding father Benjamin Franklin, writing as “Silence Dogood” in The New England Courant, July 9, 1722

The assassination of Charlie Kirk is reawakening conservatives

Monday, September 15, 2025, 8:51 am | Randy Thomasson

The Sept. 10 assassination of young conservative leader Charlie Kirk has awakened Americans — including Californians — like nothing I’ve seen.

Since Charlie’s murder in Utah by a homosexual who’s also a pro-transsexuality activist, vigils have sprung up organically across the country and up and down California.

Because Charlie was young and reaching young people, he gave many people hope for the future. For a coward to take him out, like the coward who came within a millisecond of killing Donald Trump last year in Pennsylvania, is not only shocking — it’s unacceptable. Because murdering those who disagree with you is not the mark of a free society.

Fortunately, people’s grief and righteous anger are motivating them to take a renewed stand. Because Charlie Kirk’s freedom to speak against unnatural, unhealthy “sex changes” is the same liberty granted you and me to speak for what’s right in God’s sight, with our cherished First Amendment rights, without fear of arrest, imprisonment, or death.

For the assassination of Charlie Kirk was an unacceptable attack on moral conservatives everywhere — and people with intact consciences know it.

I’m hopeful that the reawakening of moral righteousness caused by the demonic assassination of Charlie Kirk will have staying power. And if more Californians and Americans rouse themselves and their friends to vote for what’s right in God’s sight this year and next year, our nation, currently “on life support,” can revive all the more, too.

Most assuredly, I say to you, unless a grain of wheat falls into the ground and dies, it remains alone; but if it dies, it produces much grain.
Jesus Christ, Savior of the world and God in the flesh, in John 12:24

Oppose Prop. 50, the unfair, racist, gerrymandering scheme

Saturday, August 23, 2025, 10:46 am | Randy Thomasson
Squiggly-drawn, gerrymandered districts drawn by the Democrat-Party-controlled California State Legislature BEFORE the 2008 creation of the California Citizens Redistricting Commission, which drew fairer districts in 2010 and 2020.

Well, they’ve done it: The ruling Democrat Party politicians in Sacramento — Newsom & Co. — have passed their unfair, racist, tyrannical gerrymandering plan to take to the voters this September and October.

Yes, there’s going to be a statewide special election in California for the sole purpose of eliminating 5 Republican congressional seats. Everyone who is just and fair should oppose this, because squiggly-drawn districts don’t represent specific communities or regional areas, but are crassly drawn to ensure one political party always wins.

Remember, this is not because the Republican governor and legislature of Texas did something immoral and wrong. No, Texas got rid of racially-drawn districts and made them fair again. But Newsom & Co. likes race-based districts and unfairly drawn lines that are not homogeneous in nature, but artificially drawn for the specific purpose of cutting up Republican voters, thus eliminating Republican seats. Now that’s unfair!

Right now, most Californian voters support keeping the “independent” commission that has drawn district lines twice, in 2010 and 2020, using census data. But there’s going to be an expensive September campaign to try to lie to the voters and get them to pass this monstrosity.

ACTION: Please share these facts with your friends, and urge them to vote NO on Proposition 50 in the November 4, 2025 statewide special election. Spread the word, stand up for what’s good and right and fair, and reject Gavin Newsom’s power-hungry, racist scheme, which might, just might, blow up in his face.

gerrymandering: the practice of dividing or arranging a territorial unit into election districts in a way that gives one political party an unfair advantage in elections.
Gerrymandering definition, Merriam-Webster Dictionary

“What’s going on right now is one of the most outrageous threats to democracy we’ve ever seen in this state … their entire strategy is trying to fool voters because it was voters that put this commission in place and voters have clearly now said that they want it to stay there.”
U.S. Representative Kevin Kiley of California, describing Prop. 50

“You shall do no injustice in judgment, in measurement of length, weight, or volume. You shall have honest scales, honest weights, an honest ephah, and an honest hin [an 8-quart measuring container]: I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt.”
The Bible, Leviticus 19:35–36