| |
SaveCalifornia.com Blog//
Archives for the ‘California Governor’ Category
Thursday, February 12, 2026, 5:41 pm | Randy Thomasson
Gavin Newsom and his wife love being alive to pursue their pleasures. Yet because they reject the Bible and the Bible’s definition of love, they hate “unwanted” preborn babies.
So, as a “good Democrat,” Governor Newsom is again using your taxpayer dollars to torture and murder tiny boys and girls inside their mommies. Sold out to the devil, Newsom conveniently forgets he was in the womb once too.
“Newsom gives $90 million to California Planned Parenthood clinics, Washington Examiner 2/11/26:
Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-CA) signed into law on Wednesday a $90 million infusion of funds for Planned Parenthood clinics to make up for federal funding cuts from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
California lawmakers approved the one-time funding boost on Monday. Newsom said at the bill’s signing ceremony that it has been a “point of pride” to assist Planned Parenthood.
Gavin Newsom’s wife Jennifer just wants to celebrate abortion,” Life News 2/12/26:
Standing behind her husband, Siebel Newsom appeared visibly annoyed as Newsom fielded questions about the state’s troubled high-speed rail project and his planned trip to Munich. As the questions continued, one woman in the group of speakers began chanting “protect women, Planned Parenthood.”
Siebel Newsom could then be heard telling her husband she wanted to speak, before stepping forward and moving him aside.
“We just find it incredulous that we have Planned Parenthood here, and women are 51% of the population, and the majority of the questions, all of these questions have really been about other issues. So it’s just fascinating. You have this incredible women’s caucus and all these allies, and you’re not asking about it. And this happens over and over and over and over again,” Siebel Newsom said.
“You wonder why we have such a horrific war on women in this country, and that these guys are getting away with it, because you don’t seem to care,” Siebel Newsom added. “So I just offer that with love. But these are — you have incredible women in this room, and you have these allies. Ask about what we’re here for today, don’t you think?”
Katy Grimes of the California Globe on X on 2/12/26: “Well, we just find the reaction sanctimonious and smug. Not every woman thinks aborting babies is admirable.”
Throughout Scripture, God affirms the value of every human life — from children in the womb to the elderly … One of the most commonly quoted verses is Psalm 139:13-16, which says, “For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother’s womb. I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made; your works are wonderful, I know that full well. My frame was not hidden from you when I was made in the secret place, when I was woven together in the depths of the earth. Your eyes saw my unformed body; all the days ordained for me were written in your book before one of them came to be.” This verse is often cited to reference the biblical teaching that life begins at conception. Another verse that is often cited is Exodus 20:13, which says, “You shall not murder.” This verse is used to argue that abortion is the taking of a human life and therefore violates this commandment. “Bible verses about abortion,” Bible Study Tools 11/8/24
Posted in Abortion, America, Babies, Ballot, Bible, California Governor, California Legislation, California Legislature, Children, Christians, Creator God, Culture, Democrats, Donald Trump, Fatherhood, Good Science, Morality, Republicans, SaveCalifornia.com, Science, Trump, Voters | Comments Off on The Newsoms: Torture and murder ‘unwanted’ pre-born babies
Wednesday, February 4, 2026, 8:41 pm | Randy Thomasson
Why are Californians stuck with the unfair, racist Prop. 50?
The U.S. Supreme Court’s one-sentence denial of the Trump Administration’s emergency appeal petition on Feb. 4 means that Republican candidates for U.S. congressional districts in California will suffer confusion and loss (Feb. 9 is the start of the window for congressional candidates to file paperwork declaring their candidacies).
Why did this happen? Because the 6 “Republicans” on the U.S. Supreme Court have apparently decided to let individual states redraw congressional districts mid-term. They let Texas do it on Dec. 4, and now they’re “being consistent” to let California do it too.
Thus, the “chickens” on the nation’s high court have avoided applying to California’s Proposition 50 the “equal protection” or “due process” clauses of the 14th Amendment and the 15th Amendment’s prohibition of voting laws elevating “race” and “color” above others.
Hopefully, President Donald Trump is learning that he needs to nominate constitutional fighters, not politically-correct “conservatives,” like he did his first term. For there’s a big difference between Texas getting rid of racist maps and California promoting racism and breaking other laws in its Prop. 50 scheme.
SCOTUS’s cowardly deed means California Republicans will likely lose five congressional seats. And while some principled conservatives are happy to get rid of some RINOs, SaveCalifornia.com has consistently opposed Prop. 50 for its unfair gerrymandering.
As for the Republican majority in the U.S. House of Representatives, I think it will likely hold this year, since there are more Republican states doing redistricting than Democrat Party states. But since Congress has so many RINOS — Republicans In Name Only — who vote for the Swamp and with the Democrats — the bigger question is, will our Republic hold?
It’s going to be a wild and vitally important election year — and your active participation is definitely needed!
More on this story and issue:
SCOTUS Blog: “Supreme Court allows California to use congressional map benefitting Democrats”
California Globe: “Supreme Court rejects GOP bid to block California’s Prop 50 redistricting scheme”
Los Angeles Times: “Supreme Court, with no dissents, rejects GOP challenge to California’s new election map”
USA Today: “7 states tinker with congressional maps after California, Texas changes”
SaveCalifornia.com 2025: “Why the unfair, corrupt Prop. 50 passed”
Contrary to House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries’ nutty claim that Republicans are trying to “steal the midterm elections” by redistricting in Texas, state legislators there are trying to correct what the Justice Department correctly calls “unconstitutional racially based” gerrymanders … Contrary to the discrimination claims they’re making in the press, it is these errant Democrats—not Republicans—who think there is nothing wrong with judging how people will vote based on the color of their skin and who want to preserve the racist redistricting. Election law expert Hans von Spakovsky in the Daily Signal, Aug. 6, 2025
Posted in America, Ballot, California Governor, California Legislature, Congress, Constitution, Democrats, Donald Trump, Election, Fighting for what's right, Gavin Newsom, Judges, Racism, RINOs, SaveCalifornia.com, Trump, Voters | Comments Off on Why SCOTUS didn’t overturn Newsom & Co.’s unfair and racist Prop. 50
Wednesday, January 14, 2026, 12:07 pm | Randy Thomasson
Um, a dude in a sports bra and make-up is NOT female.
Because there are only two sexes: If you’ve inherited a Y chromosome from your father, you’re male; if not, you’re female. The laws of Nature and Nature’s God cannot be altered.
FAST FACTS:
- The SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States) hearing on Jan. 13 was on whether to strike down state laws in Idaho and West Virginia that prohibit biological males from invading women’s and girls’ school sports teams.
- After nearly three-and-a-half hours of arguments, reasonable court observers predict the Republican states’ pro-family laws will not be deemed unconstitutional and will therefore survive.
- In July 2025, the Trump Administration’s U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a California federal lawsuit alleging the State of California is violating Title IX by engaging “in illegal sex discrimination against female student athletes by allowing males to compete against them.”
- Title IX is a U.S. federal civil rights law passed in 1972 that prohibits sex discrimination in any education program or activity receiving federal funding. When passed, it aimed to ensure equal opportunities for women and girls in educational settings.
- In September 2025, three high school girls in Southern California, represented by Advocates for Faith & Freedom, filed a new federal lawsuit — in the same Central California federal court district that the DOJ filed its lawsuit — to protect the girls’ rights under Title IX and the U.S. Constitution.
- The California cases challenging California’s AB 1266 could reach the nation’s high court as soon as 2027; however, they must first be heard in federal district court and federal appeals court.
- AB 1266 (signed by Gov. Jerry Brown in 2013) requires all K-12 public schools to permit biological boys in girls’ restrooms, showers, clubs, and sports teams; and biological girls in boys’ restrooms, showers, clubs, and sports teams. The “right” to violate these sexual boundaries is solely a self-declaration of a different “gender identity.”
Bottom line, the right lawsuits challenging AB 1266 are in place, but the wait for a SCOTUS hearing could be one to two years from now.
In the meantime, for real protection of girls, there’s a sure way to safeguard your children and grandchildren from sexual indoctrination in the government schools. See our special website for parents, RescueYourChild.com.
“We have a sitting Supreme Court justice who won’t say what a woman is because they’re not a biologist, which is so silly, because you don’t have to be a biologist to know what a woman is. I’m not a vet, but I know what a dog is.” Riley Gaines, former college athlete and biological girls advocate, in 2023
Posted in America, California Bills, California Governor, California Legislation, Children, Congress, Constitution, Democrats, Education, Fighting for what's right, Future, Gavin Newsom, Good Science, Homeschooling, Judges, LGBT, Morality, Pam Bondi, Religious Freedom, Republicans, SaveCalifornia.com, Transsexuality, Trump | Comments Off on Will SCOTUS protect girls’ sports in California?
|
|
| |