Randy

SaveCalifornia.com Blog//

Archives for September 2025

ALERT: Don’t want your free speech banned on social media? Act now!

Monday, September 29, 2025, 9:23 am | Randy Thomasson

It’s one of the worst attacks on constitutional free speech we’ve ever seen.

Please add your voice to others demanding a veto of the awful SB 771, which would blatantly ban conservative speech on social media platforms. Put the spotlight on presidential wannabe Gavin Newsom!

Newsom now says he’s against censorship, so urge him to veto SB 771 today!

1. Web form: Go to https://www.gov.ca.gov/contact, then select “Legislation Issues/Concerns,” then “Leave a Comment,” then select “Con,” then type a subject such as “Veto SB 771”, then type or paste in your message, then enter your contact information, then click “submit.”

2. Phone: Call (916) 445-2841 Monday-Friday 9am-5pm: Tell Newsom’s office you’re calling to urge Governor Newsom to “VETO SB 771. This is blatant, unconstitutional censorship.”

The text of SB 771 lists the kind of speech it would censor:

“anti-immigrant slurs”

“anti-LGBTQ+ disinformation and harmful rhetoric”

“anti-Islamic bias”

“coercive harassment”

“hate-motivated harm”

In other words, anything and everything the New Communist Democrats don’t want to see or hear, or whatever they don’t want the general public to know.

From the Daily Caller 9/24/25:

“If people think platforms remove their content too much now, they should expect to see the pattern significantly intensify with this law,” Shoshana Weissmann, director of digital media at the R Street Institute, told the Daily Caller News Foundation. “Rather than risk liability for showing users content one could argue (even if it doesn’t actually) violate a law, platforms will over-moderate and remove posts in order to stay out of court.”

Weissman added that platforms may also find it challenging to differentiate sarcasm, serious posts and sincere discussions about sensitive subjects, adding that over-removing content will be the only way they will be able to avoid liability.

Whoever would overthrow the Liberty of a Nation, must begin by subduing the Freeness of Speech.
U.S. founding father Benjamin Franklin, writing as “Silence Dogood” in The New England Courant, July 9, 1722

Newsom & the Democrats side with invaders

Sunday, September 21, 2025, 12:27 pm | Randy Thomasson

Gov. Gavin Newsom and his Democrat Party legislators have no qualms about siding with invaders — those who have illegally crossed our borders.

And while their stance includes opposing border control, border security, and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the bill Newsom just signed to “ban” face masks on ICE agents violates both federal statutes and the U.S. Constitution.

As Breitbart News explains:

“The legislation … is unconstitutional: state police cannot enforce the law against federal law enforcement officers due to the Supremacy Clause. It also unlawfully exempts the California Highway Patrol, the force that Newsom has dispatched to protect former Vice President Kamala Harris; discriminating against federal officers violates the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause.”

What’s more, Scott Wiener’s SB 627 exempts big cities’ SWAT officers — another big legal weakness in the bill.

Ultimately, SB 627 is unenforceable and is merely fluff by Gavin Newsom telling Democrat Party activists to nominate him for president in 2028.

Q: Why is it important that ICE agents wear masks?

A: Because Leftist activists are actively trying to identify ICE agents, to dox them and threaten them and their families, to try to make them quit. 

As The Center Square reported this summer:

As publicity has increased over ICE arrests, “ICE officers are facing a 413% increase in assaults while carrying out arrests,” the U.S. Department of Homeland Security said.

Lyons said the reason why ICE agents are wearing masks is because California residents were threatening them and their family members.

During a major operation in Los Angeles, “ICE officers were doxed. People were out there taking photos of the names [of the agents], their faces and posting them online,” Lyons said. California residents were also making death threats against ICE agents’ family members, he said.

“I’m not going to let my officers and agents go out there and put their lives on the line and their family on the line because people don’t like what immigration enforcement is. They’re wearing those masks because we ran an operation with the Secret Service [and they made the arrest] someone was going online taking their photos, posting their families, their kids’ Instagram, their kids’ Facebook [pages] and targeting them,” he said.

Bottom line, you either side with invaders or you side with border security. Siding with invaders destroys nations; siding with border security preserves nations.

PROMISE MADE: “On Day One … We will begin the largest deportation operation in the history of our country.” (10/21/24, Concord, NC) PROMISE KEPT: New York Post: Trump’s mass deportation raids result in 655% spike in arrests of terrorists roaming US — including one of India’s ‘most wanted’
Since President Trump took office, there have been 139,000 deportations.
In President Trump’s first 50 days, ICE arrested 32,809 illegal immigrants — nearly 75% of whom were accused or convicted criminals — virtually the same number of arrests over the entirety of Biden’s final year in office.
NBC News: Immigration enforcement operations ramp up in cities across the U.S.

Border security update, The White House, April 28, 2025

The assassination of Charlie Kirk is reawakening conservatives

Monday, September 15, 2025, 8:51 am | Randy Thomasson

The Sept. 10 assassination of young conservative leader Charlie Kirk has awakened Americans — including Californians — like nothing I’ve seen.

Since Charlie’s murder in Utah by a homosexual who’s also a pro-transsexuality activist, vigils have sprung up organically across the country and up and down California.

Because Charlie was young and reaching young people, he gave many people hope for the future. For a coward to take him out, like the coward who came within a millisecond of killing Donald Trump last year in Pennsylvania, is not only shocking — it’s unacceptable. Because murdering those who disagree with you is not the mark of a free society.

Fortunately, people’s grief and righteous anger are motivating them to take a renewed stand. Because Charlie Kirk’s freedom to speak against unnatural, unhealthy “sex changes” is the same liberty granted you and me to speak for what’s right in God’s sight, with our cherished First Amendment rights, without fear of arrest, imprisonment, or death.

For the assassination of Charlie Kirk was an unacceptable attack on moral conservatives everywhere — and people with intact consciences know it.

I’m hopeful that the reawakening of moral righteousness caused by the demonic assassination of Charlie Kirk will have staying power. And if more Californians and Americans rouse themselves and their friends to vote for what’s right in God’s sight this year and next year, our nation, currently “on life support,” can revive all the more, too.

Most assuredly, I say to you, unless a grain of wheat falls into the ground and dies, it remains alone; but if it dies, it produces much grain.
Jesus Christ, Savior of the world and God in the flesh, in John 12:24