Wednesday, April 28, 2021, 9:15 am | Randy Thomasson
“Vaccine passports” and “vaccine certification” are a bigger threat to your God-given liberties than lockdowns and mask mandates. Because this latest threat is a big goal of inhuman, evil government — to reduce you to a number — and Big Pharma — to make continuous dollars from your continuous injections.
In early February, J.D. Powers conducted a survey of airport passengers. Of the 1500+ respondents, 58% said they have moderate to little concern about being exposed to Covid.
And given that Covid is “burning itself out” around the country (when infected people recover and receive God-given immunity), you can expect even lower concern today.
In the survey, travelers at a major U.S. international airport were also asked about the notion of airlines requiring passengers to have a “digital vaccine passport”:
33% selected “Good idea, should be required” 32% selected “Good idea, should be optional” 19% selected “Bad idea, should not be introduced” 16% selected “Bad idea, should be optional”
Do you see how two-thirds of respondents said there shouldn’t be a “Covid vaccine” in order to fly? What this means is the inhuman, tyrannical idea of a “vaccine passport” is still “up in the air” with airlines.
Which means now is the time for pro-science, pro-constitution, pro-liberty Americans to CONTACTthe major airlines and lobby them to NOT require “vaccine passports.”
Here’s a less-than-1000-character message for you to copy or edit as you wish:
Please oppose any “vaccine passport” in order to fly.
A vaccine passport is unfair to people who don’t have easy access to Covid vaccines, threatens medical privacy, and is hard to standardize worldwide.
There is no flu vaccine required to fly, so there shouldn’t be for Covid, which is less lethal than the flu (https://tinyurl.com/2bupbzzd). And herd immunity, where the infected recover and attain natural immunity, has been increasing for months.
Since these “vaccines” are experimental biological agents without full FDA approval (https://tinyurl.com/2m5h4bem), they’re inherently risky, thus controversial. A growing number of people are declining Covid “shots” due to complications, injuries, and deaths that have resulted (https://tinyurl.com/fuyht7a3).
Please also end your unscientific facemask mandate, which doesn’t stop Covid transmission (https://tinyurl.com/hb5c54vj), but dehumanizes and marginalizes passengers. You never required masks for the flu, and you shouldn’t now.
Here’s where you can send a message to any of the largest seven airlines in the United States:
The CDC announced this week that deaths reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a U.S. Government funded database that tracks injuries and deaths caused by vaccines, following experimental COVID injections, have now reached 3,486 deaths since December of 2020, when the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID shots were given emergency use authorization (EUA) by the FDA. To get a perspective on the magnitude of deaths following COVID shots that are being reported to the CDC, there were only 3,445 deaths reported to the CDC following all vaccines from 1/1/2005 through 11/30/2020, the 15-year period prior to the FDA issuing emergency use authorizations for experimental COVID injections in December of 2020. 3,486 DEATHS in the U.S. Following COVID Injections in 4 Months: More Vaccine Deaths Recorded Than the Past 15 Years COMBINED (April 20, 2021 update)
SaveCalifornia.com provides this solely for educational purposes and does not support or oppose candidates for public office.
Finally!
The California Secretary of State has officially recognized the reports of California’s 58 county registrars of voters that they’ve received 2,162,774 signatures on petitions to recall Gavin Newsom, and that 1,626,042 of these signatures are valid. And that’s the April 19 count, with another report due April 29.
This means success for the petition drive to qualify for the ballot the recall of Governor Gavin Newsom, assuming there aren’t 131,000 valid signers who change their minds and get their signatures removed by June 8. After that, it’s a steady march toward a special statewide election in November. Yet the hard part now is having the good, moral character to replace Newsom with a constitutional, good governor.
And I have to tell you, I’m concerned that otherwise conservative Californians will go with their emotions, with hearsay, and not their principles, and not with facts. That’s what happened in the 2003 recall of Democrat Gray Davis, when too many conservatives preferred social liberal Arnold Schwarzenegger over the mostly conservative Tom McClintock. Then, as governor, Schwarzenegger signed awful, sexual indoctrination bills, and placed tax hikes and the elimination of party primaries on the statewide ballot.
Some of you want to know how I’ll vote. Well, I can tell you my standards for voting on the second ballot, which will contain many candidates who want to replace Newsom. I will vote for a candidate who:
1. Has reliable moral, social, fiscal, conservative, constitutional values 2. Is not a homosexual or transsexual (which is antithetical to the above values) 3. Can win (acknowledged this September to be one of the three leading candidates)
To help you start researching, here’s information on the top four declared candidates to replace Newsom:
Quite practically, a constitutional, good governor is somebody you trust to veto ALL the bad bills that the Democrat-controlled Legislature sends to his desk.
When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice; But when a wicked man rules, the people groan… The king establishes the land by justice, But he who receives bribes overthrows it. Proverbs 29: 2 and 4
Saturday, April 24, 2021, 4:47 pm | Randy Thomasson
Note: The tyrannical, lying, politically-correct Big Pharma has shut down the study, despite not being able to refute the facts in it. You can still understand the significance of this helpful and truthful study here. And see this analysis of this unscientific censorship from Retraction Watch.
Here’s our original SaveCalifornia.com blog:
As you know, Big Pharma, Big Government, Big Media, and Big Tech are hiding the truth about mask effectiveness, telling you to just obey and mask up whenever they order you to do so.
Yet published on the website of the National Center for Biotechnological Information (NCBI), which is part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), is evidence that destroys claims that face masks for the general public are effective at blocking Covid (or other viruses).
The study, authored by Dr. Baruch Vainshelboim of Stanford University and published by the medical journal Medical Hypothesis, is carefully documented. For example, it explains what people who smell smoke through masks already know:
According to the current knowledge, the virus SARS-CoV-2 has a diameter of 60 nm to 140 nm [nanometers (billionth of a meter)] [16], [17], while medical and non-medical facemasks’ thread diameter ranges from 55 µm to 440 µm [micrometers (one millionth of a meter), which is more than 1000 times larger [25]. Due to the difference in sizes between SARS-CoV-2 diameter and facemasks thread diameter (the virus is 1000 times smaller), SARS-CoV-2 can easily pass through any facemask [25].
This honest study reports what the establishment won’t — that face masks are both useless and harmful:
The existing scientific evidences challenge the safety and efficacy of wearing facemask as preventive intervention for COVID-19. The data suggest that both medical and non-medical facemasks are ineffective to block human-to-human transmission of viral and infectious disease such as SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, supporting against the usage of facemasks. Wearing facemasks has been demonstrated to have substantial adverse physiological and psychological effects. These include hypoxia, hypercapnia, shortness of breath, increased acidity and toxicity, activation of fear and stress response, rise in stress hormones, immunosuppression, fatigue, headaches, decline in cognitive performance, predisposition for viral and infectious illnesses, chronic stress, anxiety and depression. Long-term consequences of wearing facemasks can cause health deterioration, developing and progression of chronic diseases and premature death. Governments, policy makers and health organizations should utilize proper and scientific evidence-based approach with respect to wearing facemasks, when the latter is considered as preventive intervention for public health.
The American Institute of Economic Research (AIER) commends this courageous study, writing:
The paper appears in the midst of an ongoing effort on the part of Anthony Fauci, Joe Biden, and others to normalize and universalize mask wearing, even as many states are repealing their mask mandates with public support. The evidence that doing so has had any effect on the trajectory of the virus is scant at best. The most commonly cited study from the CDC barely finds a 0.5% difference in transmission rate over 20 days and 1.8% after 100 days. The longer the time the more variables are a concern; a simply and extremely weak correlation between two data points stretches credulity, especially when used to push a radical masking of the population.
In addition, many aspects of our emergent mask culture are implausible, such as the idea that you don’t catch or spread Covid while seated and eating and can thereby be unmasked but standing and walking are too risky and therefore require masks. As to wearing them outdoors or even alone on a hike in the woods, does one even need to comment?
Given that masking of healthy populations for long periods of time is a new policy, it is astounding that the media and scientific journals decided within a matter of months that the efficacy of the practice could not be questioned or studied, nor its adverse effects discussed.
Anyone who thinks that “science” is settled after a year of implementation of a mechanism that ostensibly reduces disease spread does not understand the meaning of the word. Science is a process, by which new information and evidence are incorporated as they are discovered. Anthony Fauci and Andrew Cuomo are exploiting the term “science” to convey to the public that certain beliefs cannot be questioned, and they are being assisted by big tech platforms like YouTube, which obviously seek to control the parameters of the discussion.
No matter how many times these people repeat the word “science,” they are promoting precisely the opposite of science: dogma. By contrast, Dr. Baruch Vainshelboim is pushing us to think more broadly and fundamentally, in a way that connects with pre-2020 intuition, and for this he deserves immense credit, as does Medical Hypothesis for having published this paper. Both make a courageous attempt to analyze the costs of adopting universal masking, which is to say advancing real science.
ACTION: Please copy and paste this face mask information into emails and flyers and give to as many people as you can (you can’t post this on leading social media platforms without being suspended).
“It’s time to say enough is enough … I urge everyone in America to throw away their masks, demand their schools be open, and burn your vaccine passport if they try to give it to you.” Republican U.S. Senator Rand Paul, M.D., of Kentucky
RSS 2.0 Feed