Now that the coercive, deceptive AB 659, pushing painful, injurious Gardasil shots upon millions of California families, has passed the State Legislature, here’s what you can do:

UPDATE: AB 659 pushing Gardasil now even worse

Democrat Party and RINO (Republican In Name Only) California state legislators have passed AB 659, sending it to Gov. Gavin Newsom, who has until Oct. 14 to sign or veto.

This Big Pharma bill is now even worse with the Democrat author’s Sept. 8 amendments. Voting “yes” to give final passage to AB 659 on Sept. 12 and 13 (on Sept. 14, the Legislature adjourned for the year) were nearly every Democrat state legislator, plus “Republicans” Greg Wallis and Scott Wilk.

The amended AB 659

As amended Sept. 8, the bill INSTRUCTS (via letter or email) ALL California parents of 6th graders (except homeschoolers) that ALL “pupils…are advised…to adhere to current immunization guidelines” of the CDC and other named vaccine-loving organizations “regarding full human papillomavirus (HPV) immunization before admission or advancement to the eighth grade level of any private or public elementary or secondary school.”

AB 659’s trickery

Of course, AB 659’s mandate-like text (“the state’s public policy,” “advised,” “recommended,” “adhere to current HPV immunization guidelines,” “before admission or advancement to the eighth grade level of any private or public elementary or secondary school“) will trick many parents into BELIEVING Gardasil jabs are REQUIRED.

And the amended AB 659 gets much more specific about the parental “notification” letter. Sadly, it’s a lie-filled letter with zero science behind it. Yet, for those who follow the evidence, 17 years of Gardasil injuries and Merck’s own warnings about fainting, seizures, and other side effects will inform you that, overall, Gardasil is harmful.

3 big lies: AB 659’s letter to CA parents of 6th graders

Section 4 of the amended AB 659 describes the “notification” letter to be sent to parents:

(c) The notification sent pursuant to subdivision (b) shall also include a statement, as determined by the department, summarizing the recommended ages for the HPV vaccine and scientific rationale for vaccination at those ages, based on guidance issued by ACIP of the CDC, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the American Academy of Family Physicians. The notification shall further state the following:

“HPV vaccination can prevent over 90 percent of cancers caused by HPV. HPV vaccines are very safe, and scientific research shows that the benefits of HPV vaccination far outweigh the potential risks.”

LIE: “HPV vaccination can prevent over 90 percent of cancers caused by HPV”
FACT: There is NO HONEST evidence Gardasil shots prevent cancer of any kind. Source

LIE: “HPV vaccines are very safe”
FACT: When Gardasil has caused so many injuries and even deaths in teens and young adults since its FDA approval in 2006, it CANNOT be called “very safe.” Source

LIE: “…scientific research shows that the benefits of HPV vaccination far outweigh the potential risks”
FACT: Biochemist Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic, at the 4th International Symposium on Vaccines in Leipzig, Germany in 2016, publicly asked: “Is it ethical to put young women at risk of death or a disabling autoimmune disease at a pre-adolescent age for a vaccine that has not yet prevented a single case of cervical cancer, a disease that may develop 20-30 years after exposure to HPV, when the same can be prevented with regular Pap screening which carries no risks? We don’t know if it can offer any long-term clinical benefit for a disease that is safely preventable through other methods.” Source

ANOTHER FACT: Even Merck admits its latest Gardasil concoction isn’t reliable: “Vaccination with GARDASIL 9 may not result in protection in all vaccine recipients.” Source

Will Gov. Gavin Newsom sign or veto AB 659?

If Gavin Newsom signs AB 659, California fathers and mothers need to prioritize training themselves and their children to “just say no” to Gardasil, even when a physician “recommends” it or a school or school district pressures parents in a letter. Please “be a lion” and don’t sheepishly surrender your God-given rights of voluntary medical treatment and informed consent.

What’s more, pro-family lawsuits must be readied to sue any district that claims Gardasil shots are “required.” Because even state judges can read how AB 659 does not legally “mandate” Gardasil. Yet, due to its deception and coercion, AB 659 would deceive many parents into thinking their girls and boys must be injected or they “can’t go to school.”

TAKE ACTION NOW: Urge Newsom to veto AB 659

If Democrat Governor Gavin Newsom gets a flood of calls and emails exposing AB 659, he might — just might — veto it. Call his constituent services number, 916-445-2841 M-F 9-5 (they have staffers paid to take your message), and email anytime. 

Tell Newsom: Veto AB 659, which coercively and deceptively pushes Gardasil shots upon millions of California children and college students. You can’t tell children’s families they should do something “before admission or advancement” in school without millions of California parents believing it’s a mandate. Stop the deception and intimidation, and stop pushing these risky shots upon children and their families. Veto AB 659!

Web form instructions for Newsom’s page:

On page 1, on the right, is the question, “What is your request or comment about?”

• Under that is “Topic” and “Select an option”
• Select “An Active Bill”
• Under that, a new field will appear, asking “What specific bill”?
• Scroll through the list and select AB 659
• Under that is another selection, asking “What is the purpose of your message?”
• Select “Leave a Comment” and click “Next”

On the next page:

• Select “Con”
• In field marked “Message subject,” type over “An Active Bill,” replacing it with the new words “AB 659 VETO”
• In field below that, marked “Message,” paste in our suggested message

On the next page (you’re almost done), you don’t have to provide your phone number

But experts told The Defender there’s no proof that HPV vaccines reduce the risk of cervical cancer. Studying HPV vaccine efficacy for eliminating cervical cancer is challenging due to the extended time — 23.5 years on average — between infection and the development of cancer, lack of adequate informed consent and the complex relationship between HPV infection and cervical cancer.

Vaccinated women, believing they are protected, may also engage in riskier behavior and therefore worsen the risk of cervical cancer. According to James Lyons-Weiler, Ph.D., president and CEO of the Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge, studies claiming the vaccine reduces cervical cancer are misleading for a number of reasons. For example, some research has shown that because the HPV vaccine targets only specific HPV strains, it has led to an increase in more lethal types of HPV, replacing the less lethal types targeted by vaccination.

Lyons also pointed to other research, published in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, showing that Phase 2 and Phase 3 efficacy trials themselves have been rife with methodological problems that undermine efficacy claims. That research also points out that none of the trials were designed to detect the vaccine’s effectiveness against cervical cancer. And most trials tested HPV outcomes for people much older than children ages 9-13, when vaccination is typically offered.

Research shows that in all countries that performed smear screening, the pre-vaccination period from 1989 to 2007 was marked by a significant decrease in the incidence of cervical cancer. And that since vaccination began, that trend has reversed.

Also, despite Merck’s marketing of the HPV vaccine as “safe and effective,” many recipients have experienced serious side effects. Some of the signature impacts observed following HPV vaccination include permanently disabling autoimmune and neurological conditions such as postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, or POTS, fibromyalgia and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome.

There have been thousands of reports of adverse events worldwide, peer-reviewed scientific literature from the U.S., Australia, Denmark, Sweden, France and Japan, and statistics published by public health agencies in each of these countries that demonstrate associations between HPV vaccination and autoimmune conditions.
“Can Text Messages Sway More Black Parents to Vaccinate Teens for HPV? Rutgers Gets $600k Grant to Find Out,” Children’s Health Defense, August 29, 2023