|
SaveCalifornia.com Blog//
Archives for the ‘Democrats’ Category
Saturday, October 1, 2022, 2:47 pm | Randy Thomasson
By the end of his September 30 signing deadline, tyrannical Democrat Governor Gavin Newsom had signed hundreds of foolish, unconstitutional, and downright evil bills.
I’m reporting this not to depress you, but so you become so concerned that you’ll share this information with your friends and reasonable acquaintances, so they’ll become energized to vote this election.
While the final week of bill signings saw Newsom’s vetoes of two big, anti-parent bills — SB 70 and AB 1940 (he vetoed them because of their huge, ongoing costs), he signed the rest of the anti-parent bills, and many unconstitutional bills.
Here are the big ones that could and should be struck down:
AB 587 pressures social media companies to censor speech the Democrat-controlled government doesn’t like, such as, the truth about “Covid vaccines,” the harm of the “LGBTQIA+” agenda, the reality of election fraud, and the facts about life in the womb. AB 587 actually forces online platforms to report to the government whether they are blocking “Hate speech or racism,” “Extremism or radicalization,” “Disinformation or misinformation,” and, if so, how. These subjective terms are designed to censor your free speech, but the supporters of AB 587 think they can avoid constitutional scrutiny by forcing social media platforms to do their dirty work. Yet their fingerprints are all over this attack on the First Amendment. The larger conservative or free-speech-supporting platforms, such as Gab, Telegram, Truth Social, Rumble, Gettr, and Frank Speech should sue in federal court to repel this unconstitutional attack upon them and us.
AB 1797 will create a statewide vaccine registry, mandating most Californians’ vaccine status and “race and ethnicity” be reported to the government by “health care providers and other agencies, including schools, childcare facilities, family childcare homes, and county human services agencies.” AB 1797 is ripe for both a state and federal lawsuit, because it violates the California State Constitution’s explicit right to privacy. There’s even a California Supreme Court ruling from 1975 prohibiting any surveillance of Californians when there’s no suspected illegal activity. In addition, there’s California’s voter-approved prohibition of racial preferences (Proposition 209 from 1996). There are also federal medical privacy laws.
AB 2098 will punish doctors who have studied and tell their patients the facts about Covid (the non-threat of the “variants,”) the efficacy of natural and traditional therapeutics, and the risk of injury and death from the unsafe “Covid vaccines.” Because AB 2098 tramples medical ethics, informed consent, and the doctor-patient relationship, it must be sued and struck down in federal court. Specifically, AB 2098 infringes on the fundamental guarantee of freedom of speech in the U.S. and California constitutions. And professionally, it destroys the ethic of a second opinion — when a doctor disagrees with another doctor or even differs from so-called “consensus.”
AB 2223 permitting the killing of already-born infants and toddlers by prohibiting and punishing investigations by authorities of deaths occurring during the “perinatal period” (which a world-renowned child development authority said extends “18 to 24 months after the birth of the child.” This infanticide bill AB 2223 deserves a federal lawsuit based on the 14th Amendment‘s guarantee that States cannot “deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” Who are the constitutional California district attorneys and sheriff-coroners who will sue AB 2223 on its face?
AB 2229 will discriminate against law enforcement officer candidates (police officers, sheriff’s deputies, California Highway Patrol officers) who are practicing Christians, Catholics, Muslims, and conservative Jews. As the Legislative Counsel describes AB 2229: “Existing law requires peace officers in this state to meet specified minimum standards, including, among other requirements, that peace officers be evaluated by a physician and surgeon or psychologist and found to be free from any physical, emotional, or mental condition that might adversely affect the exercise of the powers of a peace officer. This bill would require that evaluation to include bias against race or ethnicity, gender, nationality, religion, disability, or sexual orientation.” According to current California law: “Sexual orientation” means heterosexuality, homosexuality, or bisexuality … “Gender” means sex, and includes a person’s gender identity and gender expression. “Gender expression” means a person’s gender-related appearance and behavior whether or not stereotypically associated with the person’s assigned sex at birth.” AB 2229 needs to be sued in federal court by law enforcement candidates who will be, or have been, discriminated against because of their religious values, on the strength of the 1964 U.S. Civil Rights Act.
SB 107 empowers “LGBTQIA+” activists to legally kidnap and mutilate kids. If parents in other states want to help their boys or girls overcome sexual confusion, “LGBTQIA+” groups will scheme to bring these children to California, then their attorneys will go to court and use SB 107 to give California “jurisdiction” over the children, and then California tax-funded hormone injections and “sex change” surgeries will follow. “Counseling” is part of this process, during which SB 107 will convince biological girls they’re “boys” and biological boys they’re “girls” (SB 107 calls this “gender-affirming mental health care”), then the hormone injections and irreversible “sex change” operations (which SB 107 calls “gender-affirming health care”) will follow. Federal lawsuits should be filed by state attorney generals in Republican states for this blatant violation of parental consent laws and other laws in their states. And it might require the U.S. Supreme Court to deliver a clarifying parental rights decision.
Other anti-parent bills that were signed — SB 1184, SB 1419, and SB 1479 — probably have no lawsuit potential (unless SCOTUS delivers a crystal-clear parental decision that California parents can use to regain their rights).
Religious hospitals might become exempt from SB 923‘s tyrannical transsexual indoctrination of health care providers if they sue and win in federal court on religious-freedom grounds. But pro-abortion bills, such as SB 1375 permitting nurses to kill pre-born babies and the 11 other pro-abortion bills Newsom signed, will survive all legal challenges because pro-abortion Democrat and RINO governors have built an unconstitutional, pro-abortion California Supreme Court, which callously guards “abortion rights.”
Overall, Newsom signed 997 bills this year, which were from Democrat authors or Democrat committees around 90% of the time.
One of his worst vetoes was of a Republican bill that Democrat-run committees actually passed, a bill to limit the governor’s emergency powers. Newsom arrogantly vetoed it.
When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice; But when a wicked man rules, the people groan. Proverbs 29:2
Because of the transgression of a land, many are its princes; But by a man of understanding and knowledge Right will be prolonged. Proverbs 28:2
Posted in Abortion, America, Babies, Ballot, California Bills, California Constitution, California Governor, California Legislation, California Legislature, California Supreme Court, Children, Christians, Constitution, COVID-19, Democrats, Education, Election, Employment, Fatherhood, Fighting for what's right, Future, Gavin Newsom, Good Government, Good Science, Health, Homosexuality, Judges, LGBT, Life, lockdown, Medical Freedom, Money, Morality, Parenting, Patriotism, Religious Freedom, republic, Republicans, SaveCalifornia.com, Science, Taxes, Transsexuality, Voters | Comments Off on Which of Newsom’s unconstitutional bill signings can be struck down?
Monday, September 12, 2022, 9:21 am | Randy Thomasson
California conservatives have been desperate for constitutional relief from tyrant Gavin Newsom, Joe Biden, and the New Communist Democrat machine. And now some relief has arrived!
Despite the U.S. Supreme Court failing to protect us from Covid tyranny (they refused to recognize our God-given, natural rights by upholding our 14th Amendment life, liberty, and property rights), over the last month, some Trump federal district court and appellate court judges — and believe it or not, even an Obama judge — have weakened Newsom’s and Biden’s tyrannical mandates on vaccines, abortions, “assisted suicides,” and “sex change” with the authority of the First Amendment.
Enjoy these recent legal victories for freedom of religion and freedom of speech!
Sept. 12: “Court protects Air Force class [who requested religious accommodation] from shot mandate” https://lc.org/newsroom/details/091222-court-protects-air-force-class-from-shot-mandate-1 “‘Significant proof’ Air Force discriminated against troops seeking vax religious exemptions” https://americanfaith.com/significant-proof-air-force-discriminated-against-troops-seeking-vax-religious-exemptions
Sept 2: Federal judge rules against Newsom and Democrat legislators: “California blocked from forcing Christian doctors to assist suicides” https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/sep/6/california-blocked-forcing-christian-doctors-assis/
Aug 31: Out-of-court settlement: “Kansas teacher suspended for refusing to use student’s preferred name, pronouns gets $95K in lawsuit” https://thehill.com/changing-america/respect/equality/3625946-kansas-teacher-suspended-for-refusing-to-use-students-preferred-name-pronouns-awarded-95k-in-lawsuit
Aug 26: Federal appeals court ruling: “U.S. can’t punish hospitals for refusing to do abortions, gender surgery” https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-cant-punish-christian-hospitals-refusing-do-abortions-gender-surgery-2022-08-29
Aug 25: Federal court rules against Newsom administration: “California churches don’t have to provide abortion coverage, court rules” https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/california-churches-dont-have-to-provide-abortion-coverage-court-rules
Aug 18: Federal court ruling: “U.S. Marines [who requested religious accommodation] win class protection from shot mandate” https://lc.org/newsroom/details/081922-us-marines-win-class-protection-from-shot-mandate
That religion, or the duty which we owe to our Creator and the manner of discharging it, can be directed by reason and conviction, not by force or violence; and therefore, all men are equally entitled to the free exercise of religion, according to the dictates of conscience; and that it is the mutual duty of all to practice Christian forbearance, love, and charity towards each other. Religious freedom in the 1776 Virginia Declaration of Rights (still in the Virginia Constitution, Article 1, Section 16), written by U.S. founding father George Mason, and embraced by U.S. founding fathers Thomas Jefferson and James Madison
Posted in Abortion, America, Assisted Suicide, Babies, California Governor, Children, Christians, Churches, Constitution, COVID-19, Democrats, Employment, Fighting for what's right, Future, Gavin Newsom, Good Science, Health, Medical Freedom, Morality, Religious Freedom, republic, SaveCalifornia.com, Transsexuality, U.S. founding fathers | Comments Off on 6 very welcome legal victories
Friday, August 19, 2022, 12:30 pm | Randy Thomasson
On August 18, 2022, the Democrat-controlled California State Assembly passed SB 1479 to force every K-12 government school (including charter schools) to have a “Covid testing plan” (for the purpose of testing, tracking, and quarantining children, shoving aside parents’ rights and wishes).
Final passage of SB 1479 in the State Senate is expected by August 31.
What can you do?
- Urge Governor Newsom to veto SB 1479
- Rebuke assemblymembers who voted for, or refused to speak against, SB 1479
1. Demand a veto
Believe it or not, you should actually urge a veto of SB 1479 based on Governor Newsom’s Department of Finance signficant opposition to the bill, citing its shabby financing and redundancy with current Covid policies. See DOF’s August 2 letter opposing SB 1479
Newsom’s daytime, weekday constituent services number is 916-445-2841 and here’s his web form. When you send your comment opposing SB 1479, make sure you select “Con,” meaning “oppose.”
2. Rebuke the silent Republicans
SB 1479 initially only passed by 3 votes (41 votes are needed to pass bills). So this anti-parent, medical-tyranny bill passed with only 43 yes votes, while 16 Republicans silently voted no and 3 Republicans abstained. Later that day, 12 Democrats “went with the flow” and added their yes votes.
Realize minority Republicans (only 19 out of 80 assemblymembers) don’t have the votes to win, so their voices are worth more than their votes. Thus, you can reasonably conclude a non-fighting, silent Republican is a useless Republican.
Kudos to Republican Assemblyman Kevin Kiley, the sole speaker against SB 1749 on the Assembly floor. Showing it’s not too hard to stand and speak, Kiley raised his microphone and said: “It’s time for our schools to be educational institutions rather than arms of the public health bureaucracy. This state has had the most onerous school shutdowns and mandates and testing regime of any state in the country, and we have done inestimable harm to our students as a result. No other state has taken the approach that we have. Parents and families are fed up with it. This week, for the first day of school in Los Angeles Unified, 50 thousand kids were absent. Enough is enough and I urge a no vote.”
But where were the other Republican voices? Because if even 3 more Republicans had risen to speak — about the August 11 new CDC “guidelines” recommending against screening those without symptoms, about the fact that parental consent is missing from SB 1479, and about the current California “Covid” data proving there’s no epidemic — this would have informed and pulled away or scared off several more Democrats, enough to deny this bill the minimum 41 votes to pass. Truly, a missed opportunity.
Tell these 18 silent Republicans, “Your refusal to speak up for parental rights and against medical tyranny is wrong. I’m angry with your cowardice not to speak against SB 1479.”
Because assemblymembers tend to “trash” messages from non-constituents, please call anonymously afterhours and all weekend. Yet with your own assemblymember, identify yourself for maximum impact.
Frank Bigelow 916-319-2005 and 209-267-0500 Phillip Chen 916-319-2055 and 714-529-5502 *Steven Choi 916-319-2068 and 714-665-6868 Jordan Cunningham 916-319-2035 and 805-549-3381 Megan Dahle 916-319-2001 and 530-223-6300 Laurie Davies 916-319-2073 and 949-240-7300 Heath Flora 916-319-2012 and 209-599-2112 Vince Fong 916-319-2034 and 661-395-2995 James Gallagher 916-319-2003 and 530-895-4217 *Tom Lackey 916-319-2036 and 661-267-7636 Devon Mathis 916-319-2026 and 559-636-3440 Janet Nguyen 916-319-2072 and 714-843-4966 Jim Patterson 916-319-2023 and 559-446-2029 Kelly Seyarto 916-319-2067 and 951-894-1232 Thurston Smith 916-319-2033 and 760-244-5277 Suzette Valladares 916-319-2038 and 661-286-1565 Randy Voepel 916-319-2071 and 619-258-7737 *Marie Waldron 916-319-2075 and 760-480-7570
* Also abstained on SB 1479
3. Protest the anti-parent Democrats
Tell the 55 Democrats who voted yes on SB 1479: “I’m angry that you voted for SB 1479, which parents don’t want and children don’t need. Stop oppressing us and stop trampling parental rights!”
Again, since legislators tend to “trash” messages from non-constituents, please call anonymously afterhours and all weekend. Yet when contacting your own assemblymember, identify yourself for maximum impact.
Cecilia Aguiar-Curry 916-319-2004 and 530-757-1034 David Alvarez 916-319-2080 and 619-338-8090 Rebecca Bauer-Kahan 916-319-2016 and 925-244-1600 Steve Bennett 916-319-2037 and 805-564-1649 Marc Berman 916-319-2024 and 650-324-0224 Richard Bloom 916-319-2050 and 310-450-0041 Tasha Boerner Horvath 916-319-2076 and 760-434-7605 Mia Bonta 916-319-2018 and 510-286-1670 Isaac Bryan 916-319-2054 and 310-641-5410 Lisa Calderon 916-319-2057 and 562-692-5858 Wendy Carrillo 916-319-2051 and 213-483-5151 Jim Cooper 916-319-2009 and 916-670-7888 Tom Daly 916-319-2069 and 714-939-8469 Mike Fong 916-319-2049 and 323-264-4949 Laura Friedman 916-319-2043 and 818-558-3043 Jesse Gabriel 916-319-2045 and 818-346-4521 Cristina Garcia 916-319-2058 and 562-861-5803 Eduardo Garcia 916-319-2056 and 760-347-2360 Mike Gipson 916-319-2064 and 310-324-6408 Adam Gray 916-319-2021 and 209-726-5465 Timothy Grayson 916-319-2014 and 925-521-1511 Matt Haney 916-319-2017 and 415-557-3013 Chris Holden 916-319-2041 and 626-351-1917 Jacqui Irwin 916-319-2044 and 805-482-1904 Reginald Jones-Sawyer 916-319-2059 and 213-744-2111 Ash Kalra 916-319-2027 and 408-277-1220 Alex Lee 916-319-2025 and 408-262-2501 Marc Levine 916-319-2010 and 415-479-4920 Evan Low 916-319-2028 and 408-446-2810 Brian Maienschein 916-319-2077 and 858-675-0077 Kevin McCarty 916-319-2007 and 916-324-4676 Tina McKinnor 916-319-2062 and 310-412-6400 Jose Medina 916-319-2061 and 951-369-6644 Kevin Mullin 916-319-2022 and 650-349-2200 Al Muratsuchi 916-319-2066 and 310-375-0691 Adrin Nazarian 916-319-2046 and 818-376-4246 Patrick O’Donnell 916-319-2070 and 562-429-0470 Cottie Petrie-Norris 916-319-2074 and 949-251-0074 Bill Quirk 916-319-2020 and 510-583-8818 Sharon Quirk-Silva 916-319-2065 and 714-525-6515 James Ramos 916-319-2040 and 909-476-5023 Anthony Rendon 916-319-2063 and 562-529-3250 Eloise Reyes 916-319-2047 and 909-381-3238 Luz Rivas 916-319-2039 and 818-504-3911 Robert Rivas 916-319-2030 and 831-759-8676 Freddie Rodriguez 916-319-2052 and 909-902-9606 Blanca Rubio 916-319-2048 and 626-960-4457 Rudy Salas 916-319-2032 and 661-335-0302 Miguel Santiago 916-319-2053 and 213-620-4646 Mark Stone 916-319-2029 and 831-649-2832 Curtis Ting 916-319-2019 and 415-557-2312 Christopher Ward 916-319-2078 and 619-645-3090 Akilah Weber 916-319-2079 and 619-531-7913 Buffy Wicks 916-319-2015 and 510-286-1400 Lori Wilson 916-319-2011 and 707-399-3011
Let love be without hypocrisy. Abhor what is evil. Cling to what is good. The Bible, Romans 12:9
Posted in California Legislature, Children, COVID-19, Creator God, Democrats, Fatherhood, Fighting for what's right, Gavin Newsom, Good Science, Medical Freedom, Parenting, Republicans, SaveCalifornia.com, Science, Voters | Comments Off on Permission to be angry at 55 Democrats and 18 Republicans
|
|
| |