Friday, January 16, 2026, 5:51 pm | Randy Thomasson
This California judge is wrong!
Because federal law REQUIRES states to keep voter registration data ACCURATE and CURRENT, and the federal government has jurisdiction to enforce the National Voter Registration Act (commonly known as the “motor voter law”).
I expect this unconstitutional, anti-election-accuracy opinion of Democrat Party U.S. Judge David O. Carter to eventually reach the U.S. Supreme Court for an easy ruling in favor of the Trump Administration’s and Judicial Watch’s efforts to examine the voter rolls and then require that illegals, dead people, and people who’ve moved be removed.
It’s a good start that the Trump Administration is fighting to get illegal aliens off the voter rolls. While we need the DOJ to do a full-scale investigation to expose California election fraud, it’s important and helpful that they’re demanding voter registration data from 40 states, and suing Democrat-Party-run states, including California.
Here’s the judge’s biased blatherings reported on Yahoo News:
A federal judge on Thursday dismissed a U.S. Justice Department lawsuit demanding California turn over its voter rolls, calling the request “unprecedented and illegal” and accusing the federal government of trying to “abridge the right of many Americans to cast their ballots.”
U.S. District Judge David O. Carter, a Clinton appointee based in Santa Ana, questioned the Justice Department’s motivations and called its lawsuit demanding voter data from California Secretary of State Shirley Weber not just an overreach into state-run elections, but a threat to American democracy.
“The centralization of this information by the federal government would have a chilling effect on voter registration which would inevitably lead to decreasing voter turnout as voters fear that their information is being used for some inappropriate or unlawful purpose,” Carter wrote. “This risk threatens the right to vote which is the cornerstone of American democracy.”
52 U.S.C. § 20507 … requires procedures to maintain accurate and current voter registration lists. These requirements govern, among other issues:
The date by which valid voter registration applications must be accepted and eligible persons registered,
Changes in a registrant’s address information,
Limits on removal of names from the voter registration list, and
Administration of a uniform, nondiscriminatory voter registration list maintenance program that complies with the Voting Rights Act (VRA”).
Other recent news on this initial battle to combat fraud by cleaning the voter rolls:
Jan 12: “Voter fraud alarm: 449,000 non-citizens reportedly excused from jury duty in California, raising red flags on voter rolls”
In a state already notorious for its lax election laws and ballooning non-citizen population, a resurfaced claim is reigniting fierce debate over voter integrity: Did nearly half a million Californians dodge jury duty by admitting they aren’t U.S. citizens—while somehow remaining on the voter registration lists?
The allegation, which has circulated for years but gained fresh traction on social media this weekend, points to a potential massive loophole in California’s “Motor Voter” system, where DMV interactions automatically register eligible voters but, critics argue, fail to weed out the ineligible.
The claim traces back to data from California’s Judicial Council, which reported around 449,000 individuals disqualified from jury service in a single fiscal year due to non-citizen status. Proponents of the narrative assert these same people were pulled from voter rolls for jury pools, exposing widespread non-citizen registration.
“This is how OUT OF CONTROL California is,” blasted conservative influencer Mila Joy in a viral X post that garnered over 36,000 likes and millions of views. “449,000 REGISTERED VOTERS couldn’t perform jury duty because they weren’t citizens. But they are REGISTERED VOTERS! A half a million of them.”
Jan 9: “Oregon election officials to begin purging rolls of inactive voters”
As Oregon kicks off a general election year, Secretary of State Tobias Read is taking what he says is the overdue step of cleaning up the state’s voter rolls. That process could lead to the cancellation of as many as 800,000 registrations … Oregon currently has 3,063,747 registered, active voters. About 800,000 more voters’ registration status is inactive because their mail, including ballots or official notices, from county elections offices has been returned undelivered.
Jan 6: “DOJ sues Arizona, Connecticut for refusing to hand over voter rolls”
The Justice Department has sued Arizona and Connecticut for refusing to hand over their full voter registration lists, making them the 22nd and 23rd states to be targeted by the Trump administration in its litigious campaign over voter data ahead of the midterm elections.
The lawsuits were filed Tuesday, with Attorney General Pam Bondi arguing she is charged by Congress to ensure that states have proper and effective voter registration and voter list maintenance programs.
She also threatened that she has the Civil Rights Act of 1960 to demand the statewide voter registration lists.
“Accurate voter rolls are the foundation of election integrity, and any state that fails to meet this basic obligation of transparency can expect to see us in court,” she said in a statement.
The Justice Department has sent demands for the voter registration rolls to at least 40 states and the District of Columbia, according to the Brennan Center for Justice.
Wednesday, January 14, 2026, 12:07 pm | Randy Thomasson
Um, a dude in a sports bra and make-up is NOT female.
Because there are only two sexes: If you’ve inherited a Y chromosome from your father, you’re male; if not, you’re female. The laws of Nature and Nature’s God cannot be altered.
FAST FACTS:
The SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States) hearing on Jan. 13 was on whether to strike down state laws in Idaho and West Virginia that prohibit biological males from invading women’s and girls’ school sports teams.
After nearly three-and-a-half hours of arguments, reasonable court observers predict the Republican states’ pro-family laws will not be deemed unconstitutional and will therefore survive.
In July 2025, the Trump Administration’s U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a California federal lawsuit alleging the State of California is violating Title IX by engaging “in illegal sex discrimination against female student athletes by allowing males to compete against them.”
Title IX is a U.S. federal civil rights law passed in 1972 that prohibits sex discrimination in any education program or activity receiving federal funding. When passed, it aimed to ensure equal opportunities for women and girls in educational settings.
In September 2025, three high school girls in Southern California, represented by Advocates for Faith & Freedom, filed a new federal lawsuit — in the same Central California federal court district that the DOJ filed its lawsuit — to protect the girls’ rights under Title IX and the U.S. Constitution.
The California cases challenging California’s AB 1266 could reach the nation’s high court as soon as 2027; however, they must first be heard in federal district court and federal appeals court.
AB 1266 (signed by Gov. Jerry Brown in 2013) requires all K-12 public schools to permit biological boys in girls’ restrooms, showers, clubs, and sports teams; and biological girls in boys’ restrooms, showers, clubs, and sports teams. The “right” to violate these sexual boundaries is solely a self-declaration of a different “gender identity.”
Bottom line, the right lawsuits challenging AB 1266 are in place, but the wait for a SCOTUS hearing could be one to two years from now.
In the meantime, for real protection of girls, there’s a sure way to safeguard your children and grandchildren from sexual indoctrination in the government schools. See our special website for parents, RescueYourChild.com.
“We have a sitting Supreme Court justice who won’t say what a woman is because they’re not a biologist, which is so silly, because you don’t have to be a biologist to know what a woman is. I’m not a vet, but I know what a dog is.” Riley Gaines, former college athlete and biological girls advocate, in 2023
Thursday, January 1, 2026, 10:37 pm | Randy Thomasson
As California’s governors and state legislators have gotten “progressively” worse, your domestic enemies (both Democrat Party politicians and RINOs) have invented new evil, as the Bible warns us they will do.
As of January 1, the awful bills that Gavin Newsom signed are now law. Democrat Party state legislators are three-fourths of both houses (the 40-member Senate and the 80-member Assembly) are Democrats. And too many Republicans, who should use their only power to expose evil, have become RINOs (Republicans In Name Only), who either vote in favor of Democrat bills or refuse to speak up to expose them.
Here are some of the worst, immoral, anti-family laws taking effect:
The outrageous new threat of AB 495 against impressionable children will primarily happen on government school campuses. Because parents aren’t there, and the 1-page form, which school staff must respect and obey, supersedes everything else. There is no proof of “relative” status required. For legal kidnapping to occur, all that’s needed is a compliant or confused child.
In the California statutes, “gender” already means subjective “gender identity” and “gender expression.” AB 932 takes this and prohibits “gender discrimination” in all government-run sports programs (public schools, cities, counties, etc.). Thus, the new law’s result is that biological males must be permitted to play on females’ teams and use females’ locker rooms, showers, and restrooms. And four “Republicans” joining nearly all the Democrats in voting “yes” on AB 932 shows that with Democrat Party and RINO politicians, girls lose.
This is the opposite of what parents want and children need. For youth suicide rates are significantly higher in states promoting transsexuality to kids and offering them “puberty blockers” and other “trans drugs.” And the Trevor Project on the back of student ID cards goes to a website where children can meet adult “sex” predators, all hidden from parents. AB 727 received the “yes” votes of nearly all the Democrat Party state legislators.
Even if you support so-called “assisted suicide,” what if it involves murder? SB 403’s continuation of California’s badly-written “assisted suicide” law doesn’t even guarantee the choice of the person. Even if there was evidence of a struggle, and even if an heir was present, police and paramedics and district attorneys are ordered to look the other way. Because under this dangerous law, no investigation or charge is allowed.
Abortion pills frequently injure women and girls — and always kill an innocent human being, the baby. Yet AB 260, intent on killing preborn babies, would require pharmacists to dispense them, permits teenagers to obtain abortion pills anonymously, fast-tracks it for welfare recipients, requires coverage by Medi-Cal and private insurance plans, and exempts pushers of abortion drugs from “civil, criminal, disciplinary, or other administrative action” — despite the resulting injuries.
Although sold as combating antisemitism, this deceptive bill (a product of the so-called “Diversity Caucus”) is based on Education Code, Section 220, which includes “gender, gender identity, gender expression … sexual orientation.” As such, AB 715 orders K-12 “public” schools to purge any scientific teaching about human physiology and the natural family that “would subject a pupil to unlawful discrimination” (i.e., whatever “offends” LGBTQIA+ activists). In the State Legislature, most Democrats and 28 of 30 Republicans voted “yes” for this.
Please tell others about these new horrible laws now in effect in California. And please take action to protect your family where you can (AB 495 and AB 715 are even more reasons to get your precious children and grandchildren out of the government schools).
RSS 2.0 Feed