Randy

SaveCalifornia.com Blog//

ALERT: Expose and oppose AB 1900 govt.-controlled health care

Thursday, March 12, 2026, 9:41 am | Randy Thomasson

You can help defeat “socialized medicine” in California!

This bad idea has failed before, so let’s stop government-run health care again!

A “single payer” health care system is one in which a single entity—the government—collects almost all revenue and pays almost all of the health care system’s bills.

As such, AB 1900 would result in tax hikes, long waits for treatment, and rationing of care.

Please contact your California state assemblymember (especially if he or she is a Democrat) to say: “Vote NO on AB 1900 — this will result in higher taxes, long waits, rationing, fewer doctors, and less treatment. Don’t take away my private insurance. Oppose AB 1900.”

EASY ACTION STEPS

1. Find your own California state legislators and their contact information. Simply enter your voter registration address here.

2. When you see the website links for your own legislators, click on your assemblymember’s.

3. On their home page, click the “Contact” button (usually on the upper right).

4. Use their web form to send your message to “Oppose AB 1900.” Also, call if you can (you can leave a voicemail on weekends, and before and after business hours).

MORE INFO

Only fools support the harmful notion of socialized medicine. Because where government-controlled healthcare has been tried, it’s failed.

As Sally Pipes of the Pacific Research Institute wrote on March 4:

“…consider the human cost of single-payer. 

“Canadian patients waited a median of 28.6 weeks in 2025 for treatment from a specialist following referral by a general practitioner, according to the Vancouver-based Fraser Institute.

“More than 7 million people are currently on waiting lists for hospital treatment from Britain’s National Health Service.

“Sacramento struggles to run Medi-Cal. How will it manage a $500 billion takeover of the entire health system? “The progressives who support single-payer don’t have a good answer to that question — because there isn’t one.”

“In 2016, Canadians waited an average of five months for medically necessary specialist treatments. That is more than twice the average wait time in 1993. In fact, when compared to 11 similar countries, including the United States, a recent study shows that whether it’s emergency room visits, same or next day appointments when you’re sick, seeing a specialist, or getting elective surgery, Canada’s wait times are the worst.”
Genevieve Wood, “3 reasons why socialized medicine is bad for America’s health,” The Daily Signal, 11/20/2018

“The best way to regulate these matters and the best way to achieve results is not just to concentrate on how you pay for everything, but to concentrate on how you keep the costs down. We need an approach that will put the consumer of medical services in the driver’s seat and that will not just help to pay for things. If the costs keep skyrocketing, what good is it to keep throwing money after those higher costs? We need a system that will bring those costs down. And the system that brings the costs down in every other area of our lives is a consumer-policed system of competition where people have the right to make their own choices and can then carry the dollars that they’re going to use in a way that achieves the best results for them.”
Alan Keyes, Iowa Republican Party Debate, 12/13/1990

UPDATE: Can a mostly-conservative Republican become the next governor?

Sunday, March 8, 2026, 7:21 am | Randy Thomasson

SaveCalifornia.com provides this solely for educational purposes
and does not support or oppose candidates for public office.


Now that the March 6 filing deadline for California candidates has come and gone, have the chances increased or decreased to get a mostly-conservative Republican governor?

With even imbalanced, liberal polls showing Republicans Chad Bianco and Steve Hilton in the “top two” (in California’s “jungle” primary election, only the top two vote-getters go on to the November runoff). And with the big egos of Democrats tempting them stay in the race (likely to get statewide recognition for their future campaigns), it’s looking more plausible that Republicans could “shut out” the Democrats by winning the “top two.”

Only Democrat Ian Calderon of East Los Angeles, not a statewide “name,” dropped out on Thursday, one day before the March 6 candidate filing deadline. And while he endorsed Eric Swalwell, I suspect Calderon’s racist Hispanic Democrat Party followers will prefer another Hispanic, either Antonio Villaraigosa or Xavier Becerra.

More Democrat Party leaders are worrying, and more Republican Party activists are noticing, that if California conservatives are energized to vote and propel Bianco and Hilton to “top two” positions in the June 2 “jungle” primary, that would “lock in” a mostly-conservative Republican governor in the November runoff, which would be truly historic.

Here’s our new hypothetical scenario of the governor’s race in California’s “jungle” primary. Based on the voter turnout in California’s 2024 presidential general election, SaveCalifornia.com gives 40% of the electorate to conservatives, including Republicans, and 60% of the vote to liberals, including Democrats:

21% Steve Hilton (R)
19% Chad Bianco (R)
– – – – –
15% Eric Swalwell (D)
12% Katie Porter (D)
9% Tom Steyer (D)
5% Xavier Becerra (D)
5% Antonio Villaraigosa (D)
3% Betty Yee (D)
3% Tony Thurmond (D)
3% Matt Mahan (D)
5% other

So, if you’re conservative, now is not the time to debate whether Bianco or Hilton is better. For a mostly-Republican governor is only assured if both Republicans get enough support to be the top two vote-getters who go on to the November election, where only their names will be on ballot for governor, and then one of them will be elected governor.

Heavily Democratic California could elect a Republican governor for the first time in two decades as a result of its primary voting system, recent polling suggests. The Golden State has for over a decade mandated “top-two” primaries for state and congressional elections. Candidates in those races compete in the same primary, with the first- and second-place finishers, regardless of party affiliation, advancing to the general election. In California’s 2026 gubernatorial election, however, the presence of many Democrats with no clear frontrunner could possibly lead to the two well-known Republicans taking both spots on the general election ballot, Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco and former Fox News host Steve Hilton.
Anthony Iafrate, Daily Caller News Foundation, Dec. 6, 2025

What stopping California’s anti-parent law AB 1955 means and doesn’t mean

Tuesday, March 3, 2026, 10:05 am | Randy Thomasson

If you’re glad about the U.S. Supreme Court’s action defeating part of the Democrat Party politicians’ transsexuality agenda, I’m happy about it too, without being Pollyannish.

The good news, of course, is that six judges on the U.S. Supreme Court are getting more supportive of God-given parental rights, and that California’s evil law AB 1955 is back where it belongs, under a permanent injunction.

If Newsom & Co. don’t appeal this latest court action, AB 1955, which prohibited parents from being told their own children were acting out as “trans” at school, will “die on the vine” instead of being directly struck down.

The U.S. Supreme Court’s action to “vacate the stay” of a liberal three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals means that constitutional and pro-family Judge Roger Benitez’s permanent injunction against AB 1955 stands.

As reported March 2, 2026 by the San Diego Union-Tribune:

In December, District Judge Roger Benitez ruled in favor of the Mirabelli plaintiffs, who now also include several parents who oppose such school policies.


Benitez issued a court order prohibiting California school employees from “misleading” parents about their child’s gender status, such as by using different pronouns or names with a parent than the student uses at school. His ruling also prohibited employees from using pronouns or names that differ from the student’s legal ones if the parents object.


The state promptly appealed Benitez’ decision, and in early January, the Ninth Circuit granted the state’s request to stay his ruling pending that appeal.

* * *

The Supreme Court lifted the stay based in part on its assessment of how likely it believes the parent plaintiffs are to succeed on the merits of their case.


“These policies likely violate parents’ rights to direct the upbringing and education of their children,” its ruling said.


Contrary to the Ninth Circuit, the Supreme Court majority found that Mahmoud does apply to Mirabelli. It said it considers California’s policies to be an even greater intrusion on parents’ exercise rights than the introduction of LGBTQ+ storybooks in schools it analyzed in the Mahmoud case, and that it doesn’t believe California’s policies are likely to survive the strict scrutiny standard it set in that case.

But the bad news is that AB 1955 is just the tip of the iceberg. Because there are 15 sexual indoctrination laws still requiring the brainwashing of every child in every California “public school.”

See 13 laws here, plus two more at our 2025 legislation archive, which details AB 727 (requires a pro-“LGBTQIA+” group’s phone number on student ID cards) and AB 715 (orders K-12 government schools to purge any scientific teaching about only two sexes and the natural family).

So, as I’ve been urging California parents for 17 years now — if you love your children, get them out of the godless government schools. See how at our special site for parents, Rescue Your Child. Children grow up fast, so please act now!

“Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in Me to sin, it would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck, and he were drowned in the depth of the sea.”
Jesus Christ, Savior of the world and God in the flesh, in Matthew 18:6