| |
SaveCalifornia.com Blog//
Archives for the ‘Future’ Category
Sunday, March 29, 2026, 9:49 pm | Randy Thomasson
SaveCalifornia.com provides this solely for educational purposes and does not support or oppose candidates for public office.
Q: What could Steve Hilton or Chad Bianco do as governor? A: There are five good things a mostly-conservative governor can and should do:
1. He can veto all the bad bills – protecting Californians for four years.
2. He can destroy the evil Newsom administration by replacing the leadership of all California’s 200+ departments, commissions, boards, panels, bureaus, and offices, and ordering them to “clean house.”
3. He can appoint constitutional judges (the governor gets to appoint state judges to vacant judicial seats, around 100 per year).
4. He can set a new standard of good government, with his good deeds lasting beyond his administration (such as building dams and reinstituting the death penalty for murderers).
5. He can use his “bully pulpit” to educate Californians about the difference between good and evil, with myriad examples of waste, fraud, and abuse, at the very least.
And he can do much more, such as calling special legislative sessions to address one big problem at a time, and deploying California National Guard troops to preserve public safety.
I’m writing this because there’s a real chance to elect a mostly-conservative Republican governor this year. It all depends on conservatives being energized to vote in the “jungle” primary election, starting in early May, so that Bianco and Hilton win the “top two,” guaranteeing one of them will be elected governor in the November run-off.
Californians haven’t elected a Republican governor since Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2006. But in this year’s race, opinion polls are suggesting the unthinkable for Democrats: a potential two-man showdown in November in which both candidates are from the GOP. Under the state’s electoral rules, only the top two finishers in the June 2 primary appear on the general election ballot, regardless of party. The leaders in two recent polls were Republicans, former Fox News commentator Steve Hilton and Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco. “In deep-blue California, two Republicans lead the governor’s race,” 3/27/26
Posted in Ballot, California Bills, California Governor, California Legislation, Constitution, Crime, Culture, Democrats, Education, Election, Fighting for what's right, Future, Gavin Newsom, Good Government, Judges, Public safety, Republicans, SaveCalifornia.com, Voters | Comments Off on 5 good things a conservative governor could and should do
Thursday, March 12, 2026, 9:41 am | Randy Thomasson
You can help defeat “socialized medicine” in California!
This bad idea has failed before, so let’s stop government-run health care again!
A “single payer” health care system is one in which a single entity—the government—collects almost all revenue and pays almost all of the health care system’s bills.
As such, AB 1900 would result in tax hikes, long waits for treatment, and rationing of care.
Please contact your California state assemblymember (especially if he or she is a Democrat) to say: “Vote NO on AB 1900 — this will result in higher taxes, long waits, rationing, fewer doctors, and less treatment. Don’t take away my private insurance. Oppose AB 1900.”
EASY ACTION STEPS
1. Find your own California state legislators and their contact information. Simply enter your voter registration address here.
2. When you see the website links for your own legislators, click on your assemblymember’s.
3. On their home page, click the “Contact” button (usually on the upper right).
4. Use their web form to send your message to “Oppose AB 1900.” Also, call if you can (you can leave a voicemail on weekends, and before and after business hours).
MORE INFO
Only fools support the harmful notion of socialized medicine. Because where government-controlled healthcare has been tried, it’s failed.
As Sally Pipes of the Pacific Research Institute wrote on March 4:
“…consider the human cost of single-payer.
“Canadian patients waited a median of 28.6 weeks in 2025 for treatment from a specialist following referral by a general practitioner, according to the Vancouver-based Fraser Institute.
“More than 7 million people are currently on waiting lists for hospital treatment from Britain’s National Health Service.
“Sacramento struggles to run Medi-Cal. How will it manage a $500 billion takeover of the entire health system? “The progressives who support single-payer don’t have a good answer to that question — because there isn’t one.”
“In 2016, Canadians waited an average of five months for medically necessary specialist treatments. That is more than twice the average wait time in 1993. In fact, when compared to 11 similar countries, including the United States, a recent study shows that whether it’s emergency room visits, same or next day appointments when you’re sick, seeing a specialist, or getting elective surgery, Canada’s wait times are the worst.” Genevieve Wood, “3 reasons why socialized medicine is bad for America’s health,” The Daily Signal, 11/20/2018
“The best way to regulate these matters and the best way to achieve results is not just to concentrate on how you pay for everything, but to concentrate on how you keep the costs down. We need an approach that will put the consumer of medical services in the driver’s seat and that will not just help to pay for things. If the costs keep skyrocketing, what good is it to keep throwing money after those higher costs? We need a system that will bring those costs down. And the system that brings the costs down in every other area of our lives is a consumer-policed system of competition where people have the right to make their own choices and can then carry the dollars that they’re going to use in a way that achieves the best results for them.” Alan Keyes, Iowa Republican Party Debate, 12/13/1990
Posted in California Bills, California Legislation, California Legislature, Future, Good Government, Health, Hospitals, Illegal aliens, Life, Medical Freedom, Money, SaveCalifornia.com, Taxes | Comments Off on ALERT: Expose and oppose AB 1900 govt.-controlled health care
Wednesday, January 14, 2026, 12:07 pm | Randy Thomasson
Um, a dude in a sports bra and make-up is NOT female.
Because there are only two sexes: If you’ve inherited a Y chromosome from your father, you’re male; if not, you’re female. The laws of Nature and Nature’s God cannot be altered.
FAST FACTS:
- The SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States) hearing on Jan. 13 was on whether to strike down state laws in Idaho and West Virginia that prohibit biological males from invading women’s and girls’ school sports teams.
- After nearly three-and-a-half hours of arguments, reasonable court observers predict the Republican states’ pro-family laws will not be deemed unconstitutional and will therefore survive.
- In July 2025, the Trump Administration’s U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a California federal lawsuit alleging the State of California is violating Title IX by engaging “in illegal sex discrimination against female student athletes by allowing males to compete against them.”
- Title IX is a U.S. federal civil rights law passed in 1972 that prohibits sex discrimination in any education program or activity receiving federal funding. When passed, it aimed to ensure equal opportunities for women and girls in educational settings.
- In September 2025, three high school girls in Southern California, represented by Advocates for Faith & Freedom, filed a new federal lawsuit — in the same Central California federal court district that the DOJ filed its lawsuit — to protect the girls’ rights under Title IX and the U.S. Constitution.
- The California cases challenging California’s AB 1266 could reach the nation’s high court as soon as 2027; however, they must first be heard in federal district court and federal appeals court.
- AB 1266 (signed by Gov. Jerry Brown in 2013) requires all K-12 public schools to permit biological boys in girls’ restrooms, showers, clubs, and sports teams; and biological girls in boys’ restrooms, showers, clubs, and sports teams. The “right” to violate these sexual boundaries is solely a self-declaration of a different “gender identity.”
Bottom line, the right lawsuits challenging AB 1266 are in place, but the wait for a SCOTUS hearing could be one to two years from now.
In the meantime, for real protection of girls, there’s a sure way to safeguard your children and grandchildren from sexual indoctrination in the government schools. See our special website for parents, RescueYourChild.com.
“We have a sitting Supreme Court justice who won’t say what a woman is because they’re not a biologist, which is so silly, because you don’t have to be a biologist to know what a woman is. I’m not a vet, but I know what a dog is.” Riley Gaines, former college athlete and biological girls advocate, in 2023
Posted in America, California Bills, California Governor, California Legislation, Children, Congress, Constitution, Democrats, Education, Fighting for what's right, Future, Gavin Newsom, Good Science, Homeschooling, Judges, LGBT, Morality, Pam Bondi, Religious Freedom, Republicans, SaveCalifornia.com, Transsexuality, Trump | Comments Off on Will SCOTUS protect girls’ sports in California?
|
|
| |